Message from @wacka

Discord ID: 443891356981526529


2018-05-09 21:43:05 UTC  

yes

2018-05-09 21:43:07 UTC  

wtf does it matter?

2018-05-09 21:43:15 UTC  

the end is that you know

2018-05-09 21:43:21 UTC  

does there have to be a negative point proven?

2018-05-09 21:43:58 UTC  

actually, lenghts of digits correlates with testosterone

2018-05-09 21:43:59 UTC  

well... you dont know really... do you? ... you know for that set of data... then it might turn out the yellow har wearers have higher IQ next time

2018-05-09 21:44:07 UTC  

pretty funny tbh

2018-05-09 21:44:09 UTC  

yes

2018-05-09 21:44:15 UTC  

or blue eyed people next time

2018-05-09 21:44:20 UTC  

or red heads

2018-05-09 21:44:20 UTC  

absolutely

2018-05-09 21:44:27 UTC  

and you take it all into account

2018-05-09 21:44:30 UTC  

all the data

2018-05-09 21:44:43 UTC  

yeah .. and you still dont know

2018-05-09 21:44:49 UTC  

cos its random

2018-05-09 21:44:49 UTC  

and if the results are consistent every time they take the test?

2018-05-09 21:44:53 UTC  

and you will find blue eyed people likely will only matter as much as they are common in white races, and not in african or asian races

2018-05-09 21:45:07 UTC  

say that every time the blue eyed people score lower than brown eyed people by a noticable margin?

2018-05-09 21:45:33 UTC  

its alsmost like things like eye colour can be because of genes, but intelligence is somehow not important or all equal

2018-05-09 21:45:42 UTC  

heres the thing Wacka, if you test them for all that, and the results keep changing with different values on top,

You have PROVEN that they don't have an impact

2018-05-09 21:45:46 UTC  

say I win on black at the roulette table 10 times in a row .. so what? what do you know now?

2018-05-09 21:45:57 UTC  

are you going to pick black now? .. its still 50 50

2018-05-09 21:46:01 UTC  

we dont do 10 times my dide

2018-05-09 21:46:09 UTC  

thats gambling with RNG

2018-05-09 21:46:10 UTC  

think.. 100.000's

2018-05-09 21:46:21 UTC  

and on that avergate you will find 50/50

2018-05-09 21:46:44 UTC  

especially for something as easy to trial as roulette

2018-05-09 21:46:54 UTC  

look Wacka, if you test all people for a difference in Race to IQ ratio, and the races who come out "better" keep changing, you've DISPROVEN that race has a difference in IQ

2018-05-09 21:47:04 UTC  

if however it shows a clear difference, you have instead proven it

2018-05-09 21:47:12 UTC  

that there is a difference

2018-05-09 21:47:22 UTC  

but that does happen ... pretty sure that happens

2018-05-09 21:47:40 UTC  

like in some groups black people will have higher IQs than white people ...

2018-05-09 21:48:15 UTC  

unless you are actually claiming that every test with 10 or more people thats been conducted has always shown one result

2018-05-09 21:49:16 UTC  

no, i'm claiming, that if we were to test the entire world with the same IQ test, and you rate them by race to IQ ratio,

the result is relevant, because if say on average black people score 20 points lower, you have then proven that in current humanity, black people are on AVERAGE lower of IQ

2018-05-09 21:49:38 UTC  

if that is NOT the case, and on average they are the same

2018-05-09 21:49:47 UTC  

you have then pissed off the alt-right, AND proven there is no relation

2018-05-09 21:50:08 UTC  

(you wont do it though, data is pretty solid)

2018-05-09 21:50:12 UTC  

but you will never get a same average

2018-05-09 21:50:20 UTC  

you don't have to

2018-05-09 21:50:27 UTC  

that would be crazy to have a same average

2018-05-09 21:50:35 UTC  

you dont have to have the exact same average