thats gambling with RNG

think.. 100.000's

and on that avergate you will find 50/50

especially for something as easy to trial as roulette

look Wacka, if you test all people for a difference in Race to IQ ratio, and the races who come out "better" keep changing, you've DISPROVEN that race has a difference in IQ

if however it shows a clear difference, you have instead proven it

that there is a difference

but that does happen ... pretty sure that happens

like in some groups black people will have higher IQs than white people ...

unless you are actually claiming that every test with 10 or more people thats been conducted has always shown one result

no, i'm claiming, that if we were to test the entire world with the same IQ test, and you rate them by race to IQ ratio,

the result is relevant, because if say on average black people score 20 points lower, you have then proven that in current humanity, black people are on AVERAGE lower of IQ

if that is NOT the case, and on average they are the same

you have then pissed off the alt-right, AND proven there is no relation

(you wont do it though, data is pretty solid)

but you will never get a same average

you don't have to

that would be crazy to have a same average

you dont have to have the exact same average

but if there is a clear gap in average values, with some race clearly coming out on top every single time

you can draw a conclusion

Im pretty sure its not always one group on top

asians or jews on top

usually depends if they even test jews as a seperate group, or as part of the nation they reside in

well we never tested all of humanity, so we can't say for sure

when you get a large enough sample, it can be said to be representative

i disagree that that is always the case

however we can clearly say that the average african is dragged down substantionally due to Africa being far behind in educational support for its people

you cant always determine some things... no matter how big the sample is

you can actually

sample sizes merely refine the numbers

I learnt this trying to work out random binary compression techniques back in college

It's always been based on culture and region, hasn't it?

yes

and education

and twin studies where you take babies out of their culture and place them in another, and see the result, and compare it to the other twin and its enviroment

same genes expressed differently in different environs

with some things its like trying to work out a fingerprint by taking an average of lots of people .. you can have a sample size of the whole world - its not going to tell you anything

either you don't know what the word "average" means, or you're simply wrong

i dono, could you predicts finger print patterns based on genetic data of the parents

no

i dono if you can inherit that shit