Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 449063426875064320
Syria reports US coalition led strikes on syrian government targets
DiamondGate is a thing
Example video is Best diamond no life insurance when see that best jewelry 1
Oh snap!
I was about to post about this!
^^^ Tim Pool Stream
SomeOrdinaryGamers covered it that is where I discovered it
@OliveBlanc Tim Pool reads your posts about BLM, Confirmed live on stream.
(Bureau of Land Management)
gathered info how different countries try to tackle misinformations: https://www.poynter.org/news/guide-anti-misinformation-actions-around-world
so where is tim going to announce any future livestreams
twitter?
How many views on the last one?
Anyone want to speculate on what is going to come from the court claiming that Donald Trump cannot block people?
Nothing will come of it.
Not unless they plan on making Twitter a public utility
See, that's just the thing, though.
There are actually a LOT of hypotheticals to consider in this thing.
"U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald reasoned in her opinion that Twitter is a designated public forum, so blocking users based on their political speech "constitutes viewpoint discrimination that violates the First Amendment."
This judicial opinion is absolutely LOADED with consequence.
For one thing, does this mean that political viewpoint is a protected class?
Also, if Donald Trump's twitter is a public forum
This would mean that Twitter would have a constitutional duty to unban US citizens who have been banned from the platform, right?
Because Twitter banning users who *might* use the open public forum would be against the first amendment. Especially if they were banned for political speech. (Hate speech is protected speech, as per the supreme court.)
Would Milo be required to get unbanned? 😄
Or prevent people from blocking if they are in positions of government.
People can troll govt officials in that case
This seems like a classic case of leftist authoritarian activists making demands in the moment without thinking of the consequences of what they're doing.
"no government official -- including the President -- is above the law." - Official opinion.
So, yeah.
Unban all the right wingers who were banned
open season.
Also, no doubt Twitter would be unable to censor US citizens in addressing the president or other government officials, as they have in the past.
Ugh. I'm actually reading the judgement.
The first few pages seem to be them defining everything about what Twitter actually is. I hate legalese.
```“A user’s Twitter
webpage may also include a short biographical description; a
profile picture, such as a headshot; a ‘header’ image, which
appears as a banner at the top of the webpage; the user’s location;
a button labeled ‘Message,’ which allows two users to correspond
privately; and a small sample of photographs and videos posted to
the user’s timeline, which link to a full gallery.”``` - Page 4, This fucking judgement
Yup. That's twitter, alright. -_-
```Twitter user can also ‘mention’ another user by including the other
user’s Twitter handle in a tweet.``` This judicial opinion is riveting.
Page 6.