if it was, then why would an analysis be necessary?

Tim gave an example earlier of a case where an established private park was not allowed to kick people who were expressing their first amendment right off. I forget the name of the park, but examples exist.

No private land is this " been held out for general use by the public for speech-related purposes."

by definition

college campus

or at least, used to be a good example

before the left took over

a local coffee shop

a local coffee shop can ban whoever they want

So Grenade

they cant say "is because he is black, or because he is from X religion"

but they can say "we ban him because we want"

yes. they can. and the definition of a public forum is only what the government can and cannot dictate.

sorry, they can ban whoever they want is what i was replying to

How does a twitter account apply, especially when the twitter account has belonged to the individual before election, and the right to block another person is a right given to any individual on the platform?

and furthermore, when the platform itself reserves censorious privilege.

I dont think it applies to the internet

@RyeNorth you have dodged answering my previous question. Since i already said i count the president as always being the president while he is in office. His, as basically the nature of the job demands, cannot be off duty.

So when he has sex with his beautiful wife, its the whole country thats doing it

xDD

kinky isn;t it

but lets be real, she hasn't let him tap that in a while

It's not that different from any other CEO position, really.

I dunno. I could see the appeal of copulation in the oval office

I think the Internet doesnt obey by those rules

those rules are for IRL

like in Radio and TV, nobody has the right to appear in those platforms

It's like asking, at what point am I NOT a delivery guy?

Is every action I take in respect to the company I represent?

i'd say the CEO is a representative of a company always, so if he says anything that is related to that company, even if he is "off duty", i would take it as official statement from the company. I mean, look at Musk.

That sounds like a shortcoming on your end, not necessarily Musk's fault.

tbh we have no proof Trumps twitter account belongs to trump

it could be me

you think trump wouldn't be calling it fake news if it wasn't him?

Care to clarify that?

The differentiation is harder with Trump since he talks about government stuff a lot of the time. I doubt we would take Obama's March Madness brackets in any official capacity

That was loaded with pronouns.

Im just pointing out that it makes no sense to consider twitter an open public forum, and if u do a million crazy loopholes appear

It was me all along Austin!!!

its not all of twitter, its his account, specifically any of his tweets.

Yes, the court has decided this