Message from @Ivanfr
Discord ID: 449078515820658698
Bad example lol
How is a Twitter Account a place with a 'long tradition of freedom of expression'?
obviously private land is not a open public forum
I can ban anyone from my house
@Ivanfr tell me where, in that definition of an open public forum, it says it has to be public property?
in the word "public"
which is the opposite of "privaet"
"A public forum is a place that has, by tradition or practice, been held out for general **use** by the public **for speech-related purposes.**"
it doesn't have to be public land.
"To determine which of the standards of student expression applies in a given case, many courts first conduct a "public forum analysis." The public forum analysis determines whether individuals may have access to places for communicative purposes."
if it was, then why would an analysis be necessary?
Tim gave an example earlier of a case where an established private park was not allowed to kick people who were expressing their first amendment right off. I forget the name of the park, but examples exist.
No private land is this " been held out for general use by the public for speech-related purposes."
by definition
college campus
or at least, used to be a good example
before the left took over
a local coffee shop
a local coffee shop can ban whoever they want
So Grenade
they cant say "is because he is black, or because he is from X religion"
yes. they can. and the definition of a public forum is only what the government can and cannot dictate.
sorry, they can ban whoever they want is what i was replying to
How does a twitter account apply, especially when the twitter account has belonged to the individual before election, and the right to block another person is a right given to any individual on the platform?
and furthermore, when the platform itself reserves censorious privilege.
I dont think it applies to the internet
@RyeNorth you have dodged answering my previous question. Since i already said i count the president as always being the president while he is in office. His, as basically the nature of the job demands, cannot be off duty.
So when he has sex with his beautiful wife, its the whole country thats doing it
xDD
kinky isn;t it
but lets be real, she hasn't let him tap that in a while
It's not that different from any other CEO position, really.
I dunno. I could see the appeal of copulation in the oval office
I think the Internet doesnt obey by those rules
those rules are for IRL
like in Radio and TV, nobody has the right to appear in those platforms
It's like asking, at what point am I NOT a delivery guy?
Is every action I take in respect to the company I represent?
i'd say the CEO is a representative of a company always, so if he says anything that is related to that company, even if he is "off duty", i would take it as official statement from the company. I mean, look at Musk.
That sounds like a shortcoming on your end, not necessarily Musk's fault.
tbh we have no proof Trumps twitter account belongs to trump