Message from @Ivanfr

Discord ID: 449081630532042764


2018-05-24 05:27:12 UTC  

There's no way Trump's account can be considered an open public forum

2018-05-24 05:27:33 UTC  

Twitter is never an official way of communication from the govt to you

2018-05-24 05:27:37 UTC  

it is a lil treat

2018-05-24 05:27:39 UTC  

if it is rendered impenetrable by a closed forum

2018-05-24 05:27:47 UTC  

if u wanna use it u use it if not u dont have to

2018-05-24 05:28:06 UTC  

If you've got a patch of grass, right?

2018-05-24 05:28:10 UTC  

you don't have to go to a public forum either

2018-05-24 05:28:17 UTC  

but you have the right to do so

2018-05-24 05:28:23 UTC  

Twitter is not a public forum

2018-05-24 05:28:26 UTC  

is a private company

2018-05-24 05:28:35 UTC  

is a communication service

2018-05-24 05:28:46 UTC  

Twitter is a dictatorship

2018-05-24 05:28:47 UTC  

Government person A is speaking on that grass

2018-05-24 05:28:51 UTC  

we already went over this. a public forum, by the legal definition they are using, is not restricted to public land.

2018-05-24 05:28:52 UTC  

the company does whatever they want, period.

2018-05-24 05:29:19 UTC  

can u link me to that definition

2018-05-24 05:29:29 UTC  

because I dont think it talks about virtual worlds

2018-05-24 05:29:31 UTC  

But we've got a digital equivalent.

2018-05-24 05:29:32 UTC  

it talks about land

2018-05-24 05:29:46 UTC  

It doesn't specify land, I don't believe.

2018-05-24 05:30:04 UTC  

well not private one anyway

2018-05-24 05:30:11 UTC  

and twitter is private virtual "land"

2018-05-24 05:30:19 UTC  

Is there any history of moderation for public land? (And to what extent?)

2018-05-24 05:30:26 UTC  

The point is, there's no historical basis for his twitter account to be a public forum.

2018-05-24 05:30:54 UTC  

i think there might be. depends on how far back you want to consider history, tbh.

2018-05-24 05:31:24 UTC  

If twitter is a public forum then my living room is too

2018-05-24 05:31:28 UTC  

actually

2018-05-24 05:31:29 UTC  

but there is no denying social media is a common avenue for political discourse

2018-05-24 05:31:44 UTC  

I misinterpreted what it meant by 'traditional'.

2018-05-24 05:32:08 UTC  

"by tradition or practice"

2018-05-24 05:32:08 UTC  

What they're saying is that that particular type of spot has been used

2018-05-24 05:32:42 UTC  

So, street corners, check.

2018-05-24 05:32:51 UTC  

Public parks, check.

2018-05-24 05:33:20 UTC  

If someone generally allows it in their land, they can't suddenly change their mind while it's an active ground.

2018-05-24 05:33:27 UTC  

look, no company can block u from being in a park, but twitter can block u from being in twitter

2018-05-24 05:33:35 UTC  

thats the difference right there

2018-05-24 05:33:37 UTC  

But how does that translate to digital?

2018-05-24 05:33:51 UTC  

If the govt had a official twitter-like platform then it would be different

2018-05-24 05:34:11 UTC  

You have to look at it in a generic sense, or in specific history.

2018-05-24 05:34:22 UTC  

In practice, Twitter has been censorious.