Message from @Ivanfr
Discord ID: 449081304823103488
to tweet what they want
to delete it
etc
I'm saying the court's got no grounds.
Say twitter is sold to a Russian company
now what
Vodka?
XD
so if he tweets out something related to anything going on in government, or in the country, that might be related to policy or his own position, they are saying he cannot dictate who can respond to that on twitter.
There's no way Trump's account can be considered an open public forum
Twitter is never an official way of communication from the govt to you
it is a lil treat
if it is rendered impenetrable by a closed forum
if u wanna use it u use it if not u dont have to
If you've got a patch of grass, right?
you don't have to go to a public forum either
but you have the right to do so
Twitter is not a public forum
is a private company
is a communication service
Government person A is speaking on that grass
we already went over this. a public forum, by the legal definition they are using, is not restricted to public land.
the company does whatever they want, period.
can u link me to that definition
because I dont think it talks about virtual worlds
But we've got a digital equivalent.
it talks about land
It doesn't specify land, I don't believe.
well not private one anyway
and twitter is private virtual "land"
Is there any history of moderation for public land? (And to what extent?)
The point is, there's no historical basis for his twitter account to be a public forum.
i think there might be. depends on how far back you want to consider history, tbh.
If twitter is a public forum then my living room is too
actually
but there is no denying social media is a common avenue for political discourse
I misinterpreted what it meant by 'traditional'.
"by tradition or practice"
What they're saying is that that particular type of spot has been used