If zuckerberg can lie, doesn't that mean he isn't really a machine?

His AI must be really advanced.

Today I want to be a super intelligence able to manipulate quantum reality at will. It might not make me feel better, but Oh what a set of paints!

if every company in the world commited the same crime and then suddenly one of them was caught, do you think they would be punished?

Depends on who they know, who they blow, and their bank balance.

I think Hogg just wants to be famous

but fuck swatters

not only that but if Hogg got hurt it would bolster his cause. This type of bullshit doesnt work. Let Hogg say his piece and let others debate him

for the most part, i haven't been hearing from Hogg too recently.

but i don't go looking so....

Hogg doesn't really debate though.

@Arch-Fiend what crime? you agreed to everything in the ToS *insert monotone voice and zucks face here*

This whole gun control thing isn't a conversation. There's no discussion, no back-and-forth. It's just a screaming match at this point, or worse, just naked exercise of power.

Facebook stock is at all-time highs today, so crime does pay.

Dab on that privacy tbh

it always has been a screaming match really

just autistic screeching all around and people in middle wishing they would both shut up and do something.

what that something is? no one knows

the gun control debate is 100% useless. i'm firmly in the "no guns for anyone"-camp but i do realize that it is absolutely impossible to get rid of the amount of guns that are in circulation.

if you can't get rid of ALL the guns, then the people that WILL have them will be the ones that do not care about laws.

which are the ones you least want to have them

or the people who make the laws

nah... usually more the people enforcing them

rather get shot than get doused in acid tbh. at least leave people knives.

so if a motherfucker wants to rob me at least i don't get my face melted

or, i guess you could use the same magic wand you'd need to get rid of guns to get rid of crime too

that's why i said that it is completely unrealistic to get rid of all guns in the us 😉

so basically "perfect scenario: no one has them, since that is not possible - why bother with disarming the people that do not break the law?"

the greatist act of tyranny is when a body of authority takes the method of the people to singlehandedly defend the rights they are told are protected

I think the perfect scenario would actually be no one wants to shoot me for the $20 I keep in my wallet and my 5 year old cell phone.

Although I do not agree with your baseline view falko. I do respect your method of approaching the issue.

Failing that I'd prefer retaining the ability to at least return fire.

well... i was talking about guns only... fixing your society was not on the table 😉

if you take guns from the world you better take every weapon more powerful. even then we will be violent with every weapon less powerful until we are reduced to nuggets without arms or legs

were animals, weve been violent for 500 million years

Fair enough, no one should expect one issue to fix society as a whole

you take guns from the people, even if you managed to monopolize all projectile weapons in the world to governemnt control, you would simply make the power imbalance between people hinge on a badge and a loisense that states "im a good guy and theres nothing you can do about it now"

if your government just wants to make you weaker than the people the government says are allowed to be strong, then the government is a criminal organization

of course you have to have a baseline trust your government...

we ensure trust by having a balance of force

if i was living in Venezuela i would probably think differently 😉