Same with the legacy outlets

Yt shills cnn videos thats why they dont show tims work

he is the real legacy of Jon Stewart's tenure

Maybe I'll sneak in Tim pool videos when I get into youtube

lol

And if I get fired, I'll accuse them of racism

I think there actually was someone who tried to monitor the video activity on yt and the most active vids were different from the yt trending page

Oh yeah, there are videos that only get 100k in 1 month and still get on trending

I'm in a bubble. Is this a common perspective in California? I don't think I can trust my ability to separate the crazies from the normals anymore.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-arellano-ice-border-patrol-20180619-story.html

I don't know if people here would be interested, but I found a study that discovered that rejection can flare up parts of the brain that correspond with physical pain
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14551436

Isn't it amusing that when men are involuntarily celibate, they are told to get good and ridiculed, but for women, it's the exact opposite?

@Atkins not all of California, just the hyper populated coastal cities filled with richish people completely out of touch with reality who think they are helping by making everyone poor.

I am confused by the whole american Imigration conversation

How many dangerous places are there in latin america in first place ?

Places where you can be legitimately be considered refugee if you run away from ?

And then there is the problem that you should ask for asylum in nearest safe country no ?

They aren’t trying to become refugees. If they were they would apply at border control.

But some media are referring to them as such

Of course some media is. Doesn’t make it true.

Like i can understand you can be political refugee from Cuba or maybe Venezuela

They are trying to appeal to emotion.

If you say refugee instead of illegal people feel bad for them more.

But i am interested in statistics of this

How many ppl when they ask for admitence as a refugee actually succeed ?

No idea.

Because it seems to me that huge majority of those ppl are economic migrants

And poverty isnt internationally accepted as an reason to be given refuge

If i am not wrong

What about crime? Probably not as well.

That is kind of gray area

It’s more wars and things.

Most of them claim that they are from places with zero governmantal protection and under the life danger from crime

But i happen to have few south american friends on the internet and most of latin america is pretty safe

I mean there are probably places which are dangerous

But i would say south america is much safer then africa in this regard

Mexico is poor, corrupt, and mostly run by cartels. People come to america to try and have a better life for themselves, but don't integrate usually (because learning another language is hard and why should they have to when they are mostly around 30-40 other people just like them)

grenade what I was getting at was is it a mainstream opinion that using state resources to interfere with federal border agents is legitimate, and that the state government, not the federal government, should be in charge of the border and immigration policy?

Nah it has to be fed gov

You cant relegate border safety to local municipalities

I know what the law is on the matter, I'm just wondering what mainstream opinion is in California.

what do you call mainstream?