They are appointed by elected representatives of eu countries

That much should be obvious

Ok but the executive is not appointed by MEPs.

Which executive ?

You mean eu commission?

Members of eu commission are appointed by member states

Each state appoints one

And then they grill them

the EU probably wont work because you're trying to align multiple systems of goverments, cultures, etc under a single umbrella

this was bound to happen once the honeymoon period was over

Well we will see

Its true there is some cultural friction rn

With east and west seeing things differently

But i think you can still talk things out

perhaps, but its much easier to talk things out as sovereign nations when you can go your own ways when you disagree, instead of being highly entangled

the best part of negotiations is being able to walk away

right now, you don't have that with the EU outside of a very intricate process (which has never happened before)

Well my country refused refugees

And got away with it

<:GWcfcThonk:357907199928041473>

https://twitter.com/OrwellNGoode/status/1016370760787652609

The music really ruins it.

yo

anyone knows how to look up if a person was to testify in a case?

https://pjmedia.com/trending/lesbians-blame-transgenderism-for-conversion-therapy-and-rape-culture-at-london-pride-parade/ <-- @Timcast

Always eating their own.

🌈 intersectionality

Tbh this conflict has quite a history

Yep, just look at the roots of the term 'womyn' which was made by TERFs. That's why you'll see womxn used sometimes.

Nigel Farage says he will seek to return to his former position as the leader of Ukip “if Article 50 is suspended or delayed”. In an article for the Daily Telegraph, he writes:

Hold on !

Isnt sargon supposed to be the next leader of ukip ?

Wtf !

🤣

I missed this and now sure how else might have, but a complete alternative viewpoint of Article 13

https://petapixel.com/2018/07/02/court-rules-copying-photos-found-on-internet-is-fair-use/

basically the complete opposite here in the US

wait so i can use photos i find for my own gain?

i think the most damning piece is that 1/3 of the times the guy got paid for that image, was after the "infringement", which was used more for the fact it portrayed (aka showing a location with little to no alteration), than any creative part of it. So its hard to him to claim he was hurt financially. Also that it was taken down near immediately as soon as he made it clear it was his work.

also he had uploaded twice, once was without any copyright mark

which shows DMCA works