yeah

same with bestiality

There is no argument in whether or not they are specialities, of course they are. Arguing about that is just wasting time. The fact they are victim based via the other party can not consent means they are not acceptable in the name of human rights.

*sexualities

Anyone could make a kid or a dog think taking the dick is okay, but that isn't consent because they are unable to understand the situation and effects.

yeah, definitely

Don't dick the dog, don't dick the kids. That's all folks

blurry face for president

Reminds me of that one game that had that discussion

They develop tech to make dogs be able to talk

And find out they are sentient enough to run companies.

`the furries would be so happy`

So they ask, if you manage to make something able to communicate with humans, can they still concent?

It was a wierd game. But it did make sense.

i'd say if they're sexually and mentally mature you can fuck all the dog CEOs you want

i'd follow that up with "ya fuckin furry", but still

I'm pretty sure that's a fake narrative.. just saying

Its just a silly convo in a game really

2 chars were mocking the guy

Sense in sense of it being a good point about this whole concent thing

Please dont fuck talking dogs

Gorillas can communicate with humans, but they are still docile enough to train, thus they would be trained to take the dick, which is no different to convincing a kid to take the dick.
Human intelligence or higher would be required for consent

Ability of forethought

that brings up the question of the mentally disabled being able to consent

My dog thinks 30 seconds into the future at beat

and where exactly you draw that line

my dog certainly wasn't that smart. RIP spanky you big retard

You named your dog spanky?

yea

Well they can't consent completely, they can make a personal decision, and be allowed or not by a carer depending on if it's a social norm

Hence the 'carer' part of the word 'carer', to 'care' for the decisions made

They should call them 'carers'

so the consent line is basically the same as the line at which they can no longer care for themselves

that seems fair

Well to care for yourself is to consent to your own decision. It's the same thing, do you consent to a home loan, do you consent to eating chocolate for breakfast, do you consent to munching dicks. All have long term effects

In the name of human rights you can't weigh some things more than others, sex is just another one of the many

idk i feel like letting timmy pick his breakfast cereal at the store is a whole different animal to letting timmy give uncle phil permission to diddle him

No, letting Timmy pick between Captain Crunch and Heroin is no different to letting Timmy pick between Susan from the hospital and uncle phil.

You have already demonstrated sensible logic by saying cereal, Timmy can pick a cereal because you let him choose between social norms, same as you can let him choose between Susan and Rebecca that both go to special Ed on the yellow school bus with him, and not let him eat uncle phils anus.

It is exactly the same thing

https://youtu.be/r0ZulYAeovA

damn those Russian bots, draining Iran water so Trump oppresses Muslims! 😦

Mueller indictment of Russians for interfering in the 2016 election. A few things about this indictment.

1. It doesn’t accuse any Americans of wrong doing. The FBI has explicitly stated that the no Americans are being accused in the press conference about this indictment. This includes Trump, and everyone in his campaign.

2. No vote is claimed to have been affected by these events.

3. The Russians are accused of making fake accounts, online personas, and RL identities to spread propaganda in favor of Black Lives Matter, Sanders and Trump. Also Facebook ads were purchased, and a few events were planned.

4. The actual crimes here are related to identity theft, fraud and the obfuscation of being foreign agents.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download

This is the first one FYI