Message from @Dunk Massive

Discord ID: 474068176959701013


2018-08-01 03:57:34 UTC  

I watched that TEDx talk from that girl talking about pedophilia as a genuine sexuality

2018-08-01 03:58:20 UTC  

I mean, dont want pedos or accept them

2018-08-01 03:58:36 UTC  

I recall some argument as wekk

2018-08-01 03:58:55 UTC  

And while it *may* genuinely be a sexuality, if it is, it doesn't automatically mean they should be embraced by society

2018-08-01 03:59:53 UTC  

I think the fact its a genuine sexuality does not make it something to be accepted. I dont know if this girl is asking for that.

2018-08-01 04:00:17 UTC  

I know that much.

2018-08-01 04:00:56 UTC  

Rape is a sexuality, beastiality is a sexuality, paedophilia is a sexuality. All of which have victims,thus unacceptable

2018-08-01 04:01:18 UTC  

Gay is a sexuality, has no victims

2018-08-01 04:01:21 UTC  

What differences a fetish from a sexuality?

2018-08-01 04:01:32 UTC  

The victim

2018-08-01 04:02:05 UTC  

Fetish falls within a category of sexuality

2018-08-01 04:04:47 UTC  

a sexuality is more broad while a fetish is more focused

2018-08-01 04:05:27 UTC  

Like what? I like a specific breast size is a fetish, I like women is a sexuality?

2018-08-01 04:05:31 UTC  

sexuality is big categories like an entire gender or other massive subgroup of people

2018-08-01 04:05:52 UTC  

whereas a fetish would be something like a specific set of acts or traits

2018-08-01 04:07:46 UTC  

i think technically pedophilia could be a sexuality, but one that is by definition predatory and harmful

2018-08-01 04:08:05 UTC  

Because the other party cant concent

2018-08-01 04:08:11 UTC  

Or can be trusted to

2018-08-01 04:08:16 UTC  

yeah

2018-08-01 04:08:43 UTC  

same with bestiality

2018-08-01 04:17:41 UTC  

There is no argument in whether or not they are specialities, of course they are. Arguing about that is just wasting time. The fact they are victim based via the other party can not consent means they are not acceptable in the name of human rights.

2018-08-01 04:18:01 UTC  

*sexualities

2018-08-01 04:19:17 UTC  

Anyone could make a kid or a dog think taking the dick is okay, but that isn't consent because they are unable to understand the situation and effects.

2018-08-01 04:19:40 UTC  

yeah, definitely

2018-08-01 04:19:55 UTC  

Don't dick the dog, don't dick the kids. That's all folks

2018-08-01 04:21:40 UTC  

blurry face for president

2018-08-01 04:22:17 UTC  

Reminds me of that one game that had that discussion

2018-08-01 04:22:27 UTC  

They develop tech to make dogs be able to talk

2018-08-01 04:22:38 UTC  

And find out they are sentient enough to run companies.

2018-08-01 04:23:00 UTC  

`the furries would be so happy`

2018-08-01 04:23:02 UTC  

So they ask, if you manage to make something able to communicate with humans, can they still concent?

2018-08-01 04:23:19 UTC  

It was a wierd game. But it did make sense.

2018-08-01 04:24:02 UTC  

i'd say if they're sexually and mentally mature you can fuck all the dog CEOs you want

2018-08-01 04:24:17 UTC  

i'd follow that up with "ya fuckin furry", but still

2018-08-01 04:24:32 UTC  

I'm pretty sure that's a fake narrative.. just saying

2018-08-01 04:25:13 UTC  

Its just a silly convo in a game really

2018-08-01 04:25:18 UTC  

2 chars were mocking the guy

2018-08-01 04:25:39 UTC  

Sense in sense of it being a good point about this whole concent thing

2018-08-01 04:25:53 UTC  

Please dont fuck talking dogs

2018-08-01 04:26:14 UTC  

Gorillas can communicate with humans, but they are still docile enough to train, thus they would be trained to take the dick, which is no different to convincing a kid to take the dick.
Human intelligence or higher would be required for consent

2018-08-01 04:26:48 UTC  

Ability of forethought