Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 474070183649214474
Or can be trusted to
yeah
same with bestiality
There is no argument in whether or not they are specialities, of course they are. Arguing about that is just wasting time. The fact they are victim based via the other party can not consent means they are not acceptable in the name of human rights.
*sexualities
Anyone could make a kid or a dog think taking the dick is okay, but that isn't consent because they are unable to understand the situation and effects.
yeah, definitely
Don't dick the dog, don't dick the kids. That's all folks
blurry face for president
Reminds me of that one game that had that discussion
They develop tech to make dogs be able to talk
And find out they are sentient enough to run companies.
`the furries would be so happy`
So they ask, if you manage to make something able to communicate with humans, can they still concent?
It was a wierd game. But it did make sense.
i'd say if they're sexually and mentally mature you can fuck all the dog CEOs you want
i'd follow that up with "ya fuckin furry", but still
I'm pretty sure that's a fake narrative.. just saying
Its just a silly convo in a game really
2 chars were mocking the guy
Please dont fuck talking dogs
Gorillas can communicate with humans, but they are still docile enough to train, thus they would be trained to take the dick, which is no different to convincing a kid to take the dick.
Human intelligence or higher would be required for consent
Ability of forethought
that brings up the question of the mentally disabled being able to consent
My dog thinks 30 seconds into the future at beat
and where exactly you draw that line
my dog certainly wasn't that smart. RIP spanky you big retard
You named your dog spanky?
yea
Well they can't consent completely, they can make a personal decision, and be allowed or not by a carer depending on if it's a social norm
Hence the 'carer' part of the word 'carer', to 'care' for the decisions made
They should call them 'carers'
so the consent line is basically the same as the line at which they can no longer care for themselves
that seems fair
Well to care for yourself is to consent to your own decision. It's the same thing, do you consent to a home loan, do you consent to eating chocolate for breakfast, do you consent to munching dicks. All have long term effects
In the name of human rights you can't weigh some things more than others, sex is just another one of the many
idk i feel like letting timmy pick his breakfast cereal at the store is a whole different animal to letting timmy give uncle phil permission to diddle him
No, letting Timmy pick between Captain Crunch and Heroin is no different to letting Timmy pick between Susan from the hospital and uncle phil.
You have already demonstrated sensible logic by saying cereal, Timmy can pick a cereal because you let him choose between social norms, same as you can let him choose between Susan and Rebecca that both go to special Ed on the yellow school bus with him, and not let him eat uncle phils anus.
It is exactly the same thing
damn those Russian bots, draining Iran water so Trump oppresses Muslims! 😦