Message from @The Ghost of Monarchies
Discord ID: 513154281822748684
And any other regions with that going on
PACs are fine. They can be nerfed through a constituency chapter requirement.
In such a way, republican party would become a republican PAC.
The infrastructure requirement would favor representation, and become a mitigating factor for national PACs.
A partial drain on their financial power.
Money is part of democracy, funding across state lines is like a vote in another state's elections.
yeah, the State needs to finance the Partys and get the 3rd party money out of hte partys
Huh?
The constituency needs to finance the candidate, not the party.
This is a congressman talking about the theoretical ability of the US nuking their own cities.
What a turd
Then start the war in dc
"we would rather you be radioactive ash than armed and able to defend yourselves"
More like "If we ever really decide to take your guns you won't be able to stop us." Still an incredibly stupid thing for a congressman to say, and incredibly myopic as to the realities of civil war.
wewlad
That's not a Dem or Repub thing, that's just a stupid thing. Fortunately this man is about as far away from the levers of power as Cortez.
Oh good, I joined just to point out Swalwell "Joking" that he'd nuke America in order to undermine the constitution. Glad to see someone beat me to it.
The effect of Money on campaigns is Wilddly overrated.
Hillary outspent Trump
*irish accent* and ROBERT FRAAAAANNNCIIIISSSSS O'Rourke, outspent the shit out of Cruz
It certainly helps spread the message, but memetics > money
What with the MSM and Hillary both advertising Trump for the majority of the time (Free air time because they couldn't shut up about Trump, and Hillary's moronic slogan with Trump in it) , it's a real case of work smarter, not harder.
Well There is such a thing as name Recognition that helps, but Trump had that regardless in the primaries
and Hillary is a terrible candidate
I could have won against her.
Mmmmm, I'm...not gonna bet on that.
Unless you're secretly some kind of high society mover and shaker.
Yes.
Hillary is literally the worst presidential candidate we have ever seen, or likely will ever see.
Her only wins in elections are when she have the system rigged for her
aka
"I have to move to New York to be a senator"
One major issue was, once again, Memetics, Trump was constructive in his platform (Fix things, solve problems, build things, you're gonna love it.) vs Hillary's destructive campaign (Trump is bad and terrible and people are deplorables)
and "Super Deligates"
She was terrible due to her memetics and her career.
She was terrible do to being terrible 😛
she has always been terrible