Message from @DrYuriMom
Discord ID: 521368592634216463
>did not have any reported signs of trauma
>does not appear to be suspicious
>working to determine how Krulcik died
isn't it inherently suspicious to find a dead guy and not knowing how he died?
Not really. OD doesn't always have signs you can see out right. Nor heart attack.
But if there is no outward signs of death, that doesn't usually point to foul play until you get the cause of death form a autopsy.
it makes more sense to say that they havent found anything pointing to foul play
what doesnt make sense is implying that finding dead young guys laying around isn't suspicious
That would be the definition of "not suspicious"
Typically when dealing with cops, suspicious == foul play
if i walked into your house, and i saw a dead guy on the floor, i would find that suspicious
Only if I didn't call the cops.
actually the only reason i clicked on the link was because i found the fact in the headline suspicious
That would be the point of the headline.
i guess i just find unusual out of the ordinary things suspicious
and likewise must have the reporter, otherwise he would have moved on to something more interesting
lots of people die every day
Make Myanmar Siam Again.
That would be funny if Jack got eaten by the left.
Given how many people work for Google it's not surprising at all that you would have occasional instances of sudden cardiac death on the job. I had a teacher once drop dead at the keyboard in school. It happens.
@DrYuriMom The teacher dropped dead during class?
holy shit
Literal keyboard faceplant :-(
Twitter first Silicon Valley Company to go under??
Maybe Patreon?
Right, forgot about THEM....
hopefully 2019 will be the reckoning, probably 2024 😦
dead google guy had information that would have led to the arrest of hillary clinton
🤦
@zero_consequences got any sources?
RT: (Russian Foreign Minister) Lavrov announced that Russia has no intention of taking part in the trade war between the USA and PRC
Of course not. They have no ability to be involved.
In other news, water is wet.
“ John Edwards’ Hush money was not illegal, FEC told campaign “ by James Hill, Beth Loyd and Russell Goldman on Yahoo News.
Edwards was a candidate for president in 2008. During his campaign he used campaign funds to pay a mistress who bore him a child 1 million to keep her silence. He was put on trial for felony campaign finance violations and faced a possible 30 years in prison. However the FEC concluded that “ hush money “ wasn’t a campaign finance violation, and later a jury found him innocent.
Now the Muller investigation is ignoring the FEC’s conclusion, and history, in an attempt to paint “ hush money “ as a criminal act once again. They will fail, just as the overzealous prosecutors failed to unjustly convict Edwards.
http://archive.today/YfGp2
http://archive.today/lX76U
https://youtu.be/nReSeIOzwpg
TLDR: Mexican President Obrador promises to increase Oil production, by using money that will come from cutting down on corrupt goverment spending, in the plan there is the construction of a new refinery as well as upgrading old refinery and drilling for more oil
Opinion Note: He has already stated several times that he is going to pay for other programs by cutting down on corrupt goverment spending
"We'll save money by reducing government corruption!"
"How are you going to do that when every method you have of doing so is corrupt?"
That sounds so easier said than done.
The corruption laundering will move to the energy sector instead. No harm no foul.
PEMEX has been corrupt from its inception back when Lazaro Cardenas made the oil industry state owned