Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 471847553852243972
Movie tickets are getting expensive and this Summer many people are skipping movies because of how many there are. I think there will be some major losses on many movies in the next couple years.
In part referring to amputee having to play role
Just realized something
Do SJWs have a problem with the fact that Darth Vader was played by a black man?
I dont think they know
Do SJW's know that a non-Jedi played Luke Skywalker?
Do they know that the clones were played by non clones
Hollywood's classic non-clone washing of history
Smh those racists
Interesting read about weasel words:
https://www.theknifemedia.com/world-news/topspin18apr16/
TYT lied in the linked video about Salon not making pro pedophile articles. I’ll link those articles below with a brief description. The video is the last link. The time stamp where they claim this is 8:20
“ I’m a pedophile, not a monster “
This is the famous pro pedophile article Salon did. It’s been deleted, but not before it was archived. It has a follow up, which I shall also post. By Todd Nickerson
http://archive.today/NhhZ4
“ I’m a pedophile, you’re the monster : My week inside the vile right-wing hate machine “ by Todd Nickerson
This is the follow up to the first pro pedophile Salon article. It was also deleted. It’s an attempt to frame the backlash against the normalization of pedophiles as a right wing plot.
http://archive.today/VYx1X
https://youtu.be/dxFKJ4IVOEE
Hasn't Nickerson been arrested for diddling kids since then?
Not that I’ve heard @Dan V if you find confirmation of that I’d appreciate you sending it my way.
Can't find it. I must have misunderstood. I'll just #fakenews myself
Lol
That name sounds really familiar
@angeryer he’s been in the spotlight for being a part of a group called Virtuous Pedophiles . I think he may be the head. These articles are a few years old. His name gets thrown around.
“ Trump ‘pay with cash ‘ offer on Cohen tape could spell fresh peril for President “ on The Guardian
This article lies about the content of the audio tapes. Trump clearly says the opposite of what the media is saying. He says “ Don’t pay with cash”
NOT, pay with cash.
http://archive.today/091hh
Unfortunately I have just started to ignore the media all together
Sometimes I wish I could @ExceptionalFeather
“ Michael Cohen secretly taped Trump discussion payments to Playboy model “ on New York Times NYT
Another article lying about the contents of the tapes. He says “ Don’t pay with cash” not pay with cash.
http://archive.today/2MmXA
Don’t pay with cash Trump audio tape. Listen yourself. Don’t is very clear. This is that specific part.
https://youtu.be/afLLK029OwQ
Is it really important whether he said "pay with cash" or "don't pay with cash", though?
Either way he knew about the payments
Of which he claimed ignorance.
Which may constitute an in-kind contribution.
Which is a violation of FEC regulations.
Or am I missing something?
They’re making a claim of additional shady behavior.
The FEC stuff isn’t going to go anywhere. It’s rarely prosecuted, and it would result in a fine. Plus if they did purse it with Trump, they would have to hit Hillary with the same charge for paying for the Steele Dossier. Which was also undisclosed, and in a much higher amount of money.
I’m mostly bring attention to this event because it highlights the media being deceptive for partisan purposes @DuShaun Manndik
You can read about Hillary violating FEC regulations here @DuShaun Manndik but I wouldn’t hold my breath that anything will happen of significance to Trump or Hillary over this.
http://archive.today/wQSGk
Ah I wouldn't be so confident about that. Nothing will probably happen to Hilary because the media is on her side and will obfuscate, ignore, or outright lie in her defense. But the same is not true for Trump. They're already grasping for any and every reason to bring him down. If they see this as a way, you can trust them to do whatever they can to get it done.
Why would the media take Trump down?
Fair point. Hating him is probably better for business than not having him around to hate.
They might want to create that illusion but I don't think they will slaughter their cash cow
Yeah, I wasn't thinking of that.
“Alex Jones said he would shoot Robert Mueller and Facebook still won’t ban him” by Luke Darby on GQ
This article tells three lies about Alex Jones and Infowars. 1. He doesn’t deny that Sandy Hook Shooting happened. 2. He hasn’t denied that every shooting since then was a hoax, including Parkland. Which he never denied. 3. He never threaten Robert Mueller with any violence . He used a political metaphor.
http://archive.today/nrKSz
He is a parody anyway
I think you’re mostly right @ExceptionalFeather
He doesn't believe half the things he says, its a character to make money
“ Why YouTube’s Infowars ban is meaningless “ by Emma Woollacott on Forbes
This article crying about social media not cracking down on “ conspiracy theorists” in time for the midterms, tells two lies about Alex Jones and Infowars.
1. He never said that the Parkland shooting was a hoax done by crisis actors. Didn’t happen.
2. He never posted a video of him pushing a child down on the ground. No such video exist.
http://archive.today/hCCoI
oh God you should see the old quotes from Gunn