Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 480298729908469760
My point isnt being neutral is bad
Jordan admits it all the time.
My point is people say they are neutral, which means they hold no views and therefore cant be critisized
Nidhoggr is right.
yeah if they don't make a positive claim, it's hard to criticize them, unless you criticize them for that on its own
Without acknowledging neutrality on a subject is an opinion in its own right
but you can make a positive claim from neutrality though, advocating compromise or taking the middle road
if i am right, then the goal of the anti sjws would be to live a happy life with out some stupid inmature more than often mentally retarded or unstable fuck geting into their faces for everysingle stupid reason they think is reasonable.
Not everything has the middle road
not much has a middle road imo, and it's actually a logical fallacy
And not making the choice is a choice
yes
not making a choice?
is not a choice
i think thats correct too
you're choosing to not choose
no you didnt chose shit on the first time
you're choosing to stay undecided
so you missed chosing
lol it's a semantic paradox i think
this choice something sounds tribalistic
like pick a side
sounds infantile
neutrality is a side
is not
Now this is based on the asumption the individual is aware of the choices
you are asuming everybody in teh world is listenign to you
cant you make choices without being aware of them though?
like subconsciously
no
Now this is based on the assumption the user is 100% informed of them
which is a fallacy
When the user wil only have the info they are aware of at that point
if you raise one of your hands to scratch your nose, imo it's a choice even if you're not aware of it
thats like saying when you were born it was your choice
I dont see the tribalism in that alone. Choosing something does not make you tribal.
What makes it tribal is your reason for making a choice
Did you choose x because all your mates did the same
i dont get the similarity. someone else is birthing you.