Message from @NativeInterface
Discord ID: 480298243968729088
By normal people.
She points how sjw is shit. And I go "too baderino" both sides are shit
Anti-SJWs don't have a collective goal after the SJWs are gone.
And act as if being neutral makes me above criticism
I mean alot of gg people wish gg doesent have to exist
being neutral is a pretty radical position which can even be difficult to realize
most countries fail to maintain their neutrality
But once you make your entire identity arpund opposing something.
anti sjws?
It starts looking like fanatism
Neutrality isn't always people not wanting to be seen on one side of the other.
arent the anti sjws everyone is not a sjw?
Neutrality is often "Oh I haven't looked into it enough yet."
My point isnt being neutral is bad
Jordan admits it all the time.
My point is people say they are neutral, which means they hold no views and therefore cant be critisized
Nidhoggr is right.
yeah if they don't make a positive claim, it's hard to criticize them, unless you criticize them for that on its own
Without acknowledging neutrality on a subject is an opinion in its own right
but you can make a positive claim from neutrality though, advocating compromise or taking the middle road
if i am right, then the goal of the anti sjws would be to live a happy life with out some stupid inmature more than often mentally retarded or unstable fuck geting into their faces for everysingle stupid reason they think is reasonable.
Not everything has the middle road
not much has a middle road imo, and it's actually a logical fallacy
And not making the choice is a choice
yes
not making a choice?
is not a choice
i think thats correct too
you're choosing to not choose
no you didnt chose shit on the first time
you're choosing to stay undecided
so you missed chosing
there was no choice
lol it's a semantic paradox i think
this choice something sounds tribalistic
like pick a side
sounds infantile
neutrality is a side
is not
Now this is based on the asumption the individual is aware of the choices