not much has a middle road imo, and it's actually a logical fallacy

And not making the choice is a choice

yes

not making a choice?

is not a choice

i think thats correct too

you're choosing to not choose

no you didnt chose shit on the first time

you're choosing to stay undecided

so you missed chosing

there was no choice

lol it's a semantic paradox i think

this choice something sounds tribalistic

like pick a side

sounds infantile

neutrality is a side

is not

Now this is based on the asumption the individual is aware of the choices

you are asuming everybody in teh world is listenign to you

cant you make choices without being aware of them though?

like subconsciously

no

Now this is based on the assumption the user is 100% informed of them

which is a fallacy

When the user wil only have the info they are aware of at that point

if you raise one of your hands to scratch your nose, imo it's a choice even if you're not aware of it

thats like saying when you were born it was your choice

I dont see the tribalism in that alone. Choosing something does not make you tribal.

What makes it tribal is your reason for making a choice

Did you choose x because all your mates did the same

i dont get the similarity. someone else is birthing you.

Or did you come to your own conclusion that x is better

forcing ppl to make a choice or be part of the proccess of a choice making with out their knowledge is tribalistic

you are talkign now out of power

Choosing to not choose is a choice. To choose not to, one has to be aware of the choice.

with those unetical line of thoghts you are giving people guilt or resposability of actions and choices they had ntohing to do with

tribalistic

Now thays a rather pointed accusation you are making no?

no

thats ethics

We are not talking about laws or crime here.