Message from @NativeInterface
Discord ID: 480298969852018699
Not everything has the middle road
not much has a middle road imo, and it's actually a logical fallacy
And not making the choice is a choice
yes
not making a choice?
is not a choice
i think thats correct too
you're choosing to not choose
no you didnt chose shit on the first time
you're choosing to stay undecided
so you missed chosing
there was no choice
lol it's a semantic paradox i think
this choice something sounds tribalistic
like pick a side
sounds infantile
neutrality is a side
is not
Now this is based on the asumption the individual is aware of the choices
you are asuming everybody in teh world is listenign to you
like subconsciously
no
Now this is based on the assumption the user is 100% informed of them
which is a fallacy
When the user wil only have the info they are aware of at that point
if you raise one of your hands to scratch your nose, imo it's a choice even if you're not aware of it
thats like saying when you were born it was your choice
I dont see the tribalism in that alone. Choosing something does not make you tribal.
What makes it tribal is your reason for making a choice
Did you choose x because all your mates did the same
i dont get the similarity. someone else is birthing you.
Or did you come to your own conclusion that x is better
forcing ppl to make a choice or be part of the proccess of a choice making with out their knowledge is tribalistic
you are talkign now out of power
Choosing to not choose is a choice. To choose not to, one has to be aware of the choice.
with those unetical line of thoghts you are giving people guilt or resposability of actions and choices they had ntohing to do with
tribalistic
Now thays a rather pointed accusation you are making no?
no
thats ethics