Message from @Lagomaster24
Discord ID: 487386064026206221
The law has no actual necessary connection to justice, nor is it relevant consequentially if nobody ever enforces it
There are plenty of unjust laws, or laws nobody really pays attention to
@GingaBomber Yeah, people can be anti-torture for various reasons. From my perspective, there's something fundamentally wrong with it, regardless of the information gathered.
Eh call it pragmatism.
Personally if I was told that I had to do shit like that for something I really care about, im not gonna lie but Ill be inclined to agree with it.
But im not saying that makes it right.
A pro life woman's picture was used in a pro abortion story
@GingaBomber Part of the human condition - we don't always live up to our ideals.
Until we actually face a given set of circumstances, we're limited to speaking in hypotheticals about our hopes for how we'd respond.
I’m law abiding citizen... most of the time- says the protestor amongst the mob as they vandalize someone’s car.
It doesn’t matter how you act when eyes are on you, it’s how you act when no one is watching
@Matt-Kill723 dunno why you have to show that video, really no point. The only people who still genuinely believe msm do not listen to logic
Turkish television.
They are not wrong.... just like saying since God is love and Love is blind, God is Steve Wonder
Action News: Asking the Hard Questions
Yes?
Depends on the mascot?
Is Barny a furrie?
No, Barnie is a scaly.
They're the ones into lizards.
i think hes asking about the suit not the character
And the Fake News Aspect, people are citing this as a "Dogman Attack"
Mountain Lion?
No claw or bite punchers, so that is inconsistent with a Puma
kitty
k
They are slowly moving back east due to an increase in sightings so was curious
Who is this guy writing this for?
The people who want to silence their opposition and cut down on freedom of speech.
There's a massive horde of them in the academies and they're becoming mainstream.
"Disagreement requires a shared set of presuppositions about the world." - who decides what these presuppositions are, and what are the consequences for those that reject them?
Is their disagreement invalidated?