Gender expression is a characteristic that is independent of sex, right?

Don't diss mai waifus, Zepp :p

Is there still such a thing as biological sex?

Are there two sexes but infinite numbers of genders?

what is gender expression then?

what is gender?

Or are there infinite numbers of sexes and different genders? Because, I hear intersex being brought up a lot in those contexts.

Because, if there is no clear sex, then there cannot be gender expression that correlates to any sex, because gender is any appearance.

Gender expression is a thing only because some people get thier undies in a bunch when a guy wears a dress or cosmetics

You would no longer be able to tie any appearance to any sex.

Wearing a hat could be a gender expression then.

Yes a hat can

so we are protecting people from being called weird?

Why should wearing a dress be a gender expression if it is all a social construct and there are correlations with sex?

why protect wearing a dress and not a pocket protector?

What parts of your appearance are related to gender?

You would no longer be able to tell.

this would be part of the problem with such things being accepted. where is the line

Then nothing or everything could be tied to gender.

what is the difference.

I gotta go to work but I'd love to talk more about this later

certainly

k sorry

i derailed this

No, you comments are inline with my current line of questioning

No, it's fine. I know you don't like birds very much.

but i am curious

No worries. I teach Transgender Medicine and it confuses me how society has been going the past 10 years or so.

we'll pick this up later

give me a ping when you are done with work

(i almost have a meeting to go to)

Where do you teach?

CA or WA?

What Slimebags...
https://youtu.be/d6Au-JpjaGM

Yes, that is what I predicted.

(Will their Ballot ever be submitted? Tune in next time on USA Today)

Wasn't the Broward County election already declared illegal?

I think it was

I don't know where to bring this, but I was in a godawful Twitter "debate" yesterday with someone who insisted the majority of Americans are for stricter gun control, and then proved it by citing a poll
where they got responses from 1,000 people.
I did the math myself and that came out to approximately .0003% of the U.S. population.
I tried to tell them that's a horrible sample size if you want to represent the views of the entire nation, but then they spent several tweets after that insisting I just don't understand how representative sampling works and I was engaging in the personal incredulity fallacy.
But I feel like I wasn't too far off. I mean, come on.

I felt like it fit in here because I feel like they were using statistics in the same way fake news would.

@Pendell not to mention that, if this twitter user regularly espouses viewpoints of a particular political tribe, then their followers likely belong to that same political tribe which could skew the results of the poll