Message from @paradigm
Discord ID: 515590120678883329
At least the true monarchies had divinely granted responsibilities along with their rights. Clinton has only entitlement, no duties she recognizes.
I think it is telling that she's testing this by speaking about Europe's problem while in Europe. It permits plausible deniability if it were to blow up. "Oh, of *course* I wasn't referring to the US situation. Why would you ever think that!"
Every time Clinton's "position" on an issue comes up, I think of Hitchens, and Superpredators, and her stance on Same-Sex Marriage
Clinton supported the wall
before she opposed it
at the end of the day, the Clintons are driven by maximizing the power of their dynasty
they've thrown everyone and everything under the bus in the process
including the Democratic party
now...
if you are willing to throw principles and party to the wolves in your blind pursuit of power,
why not democracy itself, eh?
Well, I will agree with you now. But in the late 1980's Bill Clinton was a major player in the "third way" movement within the Democratic Party after some real humdinger losses in 1984 and 1988. I think back then there were real convictions. Now, not so much.
> I think people are beginning to understand that Trump does not represent American values.
> He doesn’t even really represent the values of most people who voted for him.
> And so, I think people don’t actually really consider Trump a legitimate president.
...
> *He was obviously elected and all this business*, but he does not represent American values.
an "obviously elected" President
is not legitimate
because he does not represent the values of the Clinton machine
Having been in my 20's in the 1990's and very aware of events, Bill Clinton really was a bit of a counter-revolutionary in a Democratic Party that had been in the thrall of their left side since Carter's loss in 1980.
---> you couldn't make this stuff up - it's like Amazon deleting Orwell's 1984 from everyone's Kindle
^When you marinated for such a long time in self-righteousness, that you actually convinced yourself you are the living embodiment of american values.
indeed
"elected *and all this business*"
^ note the dismissive tone
him, in a near future
the European Union is a shitshow
Verhofstadt is correct tho
the only thing standing in his way for his totalitarian utopia to function
I recognized that 20 years ago, or more,
when a fish monger selling fish in London
measured in pounds and ounces
was made a criminal for that heinous act
is all these pesky countries refusing to transfer all their power to him
indeed
Grosser Deutchland would be complete after the transfer
Just like before
i only see this end in conflict
the question is not if
the question is when and what kind of conflict
it could end in disinterest
if the EU fails to deliver
and member states make their own arrangements with foreign powers
it could simply decline
the EU ministers are a joke, and could be made the subject of ridicule
If the EU fails to enforce itself on its "member-states"
it can dissolve into something pointless
but if it manages to get force behind its policies
thats where i think you gonna see a real conflict happening
the whole EU is a joke at this point, a really bad authoritarian joke for that matter
Heil, Europa!
What Germany was unable to accomplish in war, it finally appears to accomplish in peace.
Pax Germanum
Hillary is quite correct on refugees and migration
that really will drive people across europe to vote out the mainstream politicians who support it
it is actually quite interesting, because HRC bears considerable personal responsibility for the refugee crisis in europe now