Capitalism is peak eugenics.

wrong

while i admit, i LOLed at that... i still don't think we really have enough research to prove that eugenics is really a thing.

i'm all for children all growing up in a loving environment which encourages education and hard work. If we study multiple 'races' with these same environments, we'd have better data.

It encourages genetic defectives who are immoral to gain more money. People who are evil who break or bend laws and cut corners manage to grab more wealth.

@Aero homogeneity is non negotiable

being 'evil' is subjective and changes with the times.

subjectivity doesn't exist, what exists is a gradation of understanding of truth

? O.o truth changes from person to person. facts do not

to state universally all things are subjective perception is invoking a transcendental in universal truth

You're off your rocker mate.

for example if I say "there is no truth" that is a truth claim

no I am just smarter than you, so you are confused

Value is subjective, bruh.

wrong, value in economics I would say is based on something tangible and real, production as a process

hence why I think currency should be based on production function, it's not so different from Smith's labor as value theory

There are no utils.

i'd like to make this clear on economics: economists are essentially the modern-day alchemists. they "know" nothing for a fact. if they claim to, they are either delusional, or lying. they are fortune tellers who shout out when they are right and gloss over anything they are wrong about.

well, a lot of modern economics is based on theoretical speculation and math autism, but there's certain aspects to it which are real

https://youtu.be/17DkMDvKqw0

production is a tangible real thing

yes, there is a real backbone to economics, but most of that is just the basics.

the basics are more salient as you get to the higher levels ironically

t.econ graduate school student

Value depends on purpose. Purpose depends on the individual. Collective consciousness is a spook.

i'd classify production part of the basics. but keep in mind, humans have a social aspect to them. homogeneity may make things easier, but will almost certainly not make things better.

individualism is a spook propagated by jewish intellectuals

Hitler was a Jew

@Aero I would argue economics is itself a branch of moral philosophy

the problem is capitalists are amoral or immoral

Science is amoral.

yes, which is the problem, there is no ascendancy principle

simply finding shit out is retarded because certain paths diverge into dangerous technologies which can end civilization (ai as example)

btw regulating technologies like nanotech, ai etc will require dictatorship or absolute monarchy

so either way we are necessary to the current structure and tech of society

Honestly can't tell if you're shitposting.

I'd have to get more into moral philosophy myself, but reading some chinese literature makes me think that there is no truly moral way of thinking that will not change in the future.

There is, it's called traditional Christianity in league with an authoritarian state.

Blasphemy.

I'm not shitposting. I reject all modern liberal ideas.

I genuinely think that enlightenment was the worst thing to happen to Europe.