That is fucking retarded.

why

It's a legal definition dude, it doesn't mean literally everyone is a govt worker

ultimately, creating 'races' in the first place was a mistake.

if your society is built upon volkish principle and the ascendancy principle of race, you can't get away with tyranny

If you define the state as a race, is it anarchist, or is there a state?

in the long run, we'd be a better species if we just got rid of the classification

also I would retain second amendment type rights, as one would need the measn to kill any tyrant

@Aero nonsense, focusing and specialization is how you get ahead in the world, amassing the world's genetic garbage into one nation creates a shithole like Brazil

Also I find the speciation of races as "humanity" tenuous at best given genetic variation

You can't do what you want to do if you let the people keep their guns.

indeed, which is another failsafe

>implying brazil is garbage because of its genetic makeup instead of the travesty that was the toppling of the monarchy

toppling of monarchy was part of it, allowing millions of low tier people to live there contributed more

States can't implement eugenics, only dysgenics.

incorrect, eugenics can be implemented, and in relatively non invasive ways

you don't need to gas the defectives, that doesn't even work due to gene drift in mean reversion

capitalism and liberal ideals are dysgenic though

Capitalism is peak eugenics.

wrong

while i admit, i LOLed at that... i still don't think we really have enough research to prove that eugenics is really a thing.

i'm all for children all growing up in a loving environment which encourages education and hard work. If we study multiple 'races' with these same environments, we'd have better data.

It encourages genetic defectives who are immoral to gain more money. People who are evil who break or bend laws and cut corners manage to grab more wealth.

@Aero homogeneity is non negotiable

being 'evil' is subjective and changes with the times.

subjectivity doesn't exist, what exists is a gradation of understanding of truth

? O.o truth changes from person to person. facts do not

to state universally all things are subjective perception is invoking a transcendental in universal truth

You're off your rocker mate.

for example if I say "there is no truth" that is a truth claim

no I am just smarter than you, so you are confused

Value is subjective, bruh.

wrong, value in economics I would say is based on something tangible and real, production as a process

hence why I think currency should be based on production function, it's not so different from Smith's labor as value theory

There are no utils.

i'd like to make this clear on economics: economists are essentially the modern-day alchemists. they "know" nothing for a fact. if they claim to, they are either delusional, or lying. they are fortune tellers who shout out when they are right and gloss over anything they are wrong about.

well, a lot of modern economics is based on theoretical speculation and math autism, but there's certain aspects to it which are real

https://youtu.be/17DkMDvKqw0

production is a tangible real thing

yes, there is a real backbone to economics, but most of that is just the basics.

the basics are more salient as you get to the higher levels ironically

t.econ graduate school student