Message from @Vril-Gesellschaft
Discord ID: 545670089052258321
why
It's a legal definition dude, it doesn't mean literally everyone is a govt worker
ultimately, creating 'races' in the first place was a mistake.
if your society is built upon volkish principle and the ascendancy principle of race, you can't get away with tyranny
If you define the state as a race, is it anarchist, or is there a state?
in the long run, we'd be a better species if we just got rid of the classification
also I would retain second amendment type rights, as one would need the measn to kill any tyrant
@Aero nonsense, focusing and specialization is how you get ahead in the world, amassing the world's genetic garbage into one nation creates a shithole like Brazil
Also I find the speciation of races as "humanity" tenuous at best given genetic variation
You can't do what you want to do if you let the people keep their guns.
indeed, which is another failsafe
>implying brazil is garbage because of its genetic makeup instead of the travesty that was the toppling of the monarchy
toppling of monarchy was part of it, allowing millions of low tier people to live there contributed more
States can't implement eugenics, only dysgenics.
incorrect, eugenics can be implemented, and in relatively non invasive ways
you don't need to gas the defectives, that doesn't even work due to gene drift in mean reversion
capitalism and liberal ideals are dysgenic though
Capitalism is peak eugenics.
wrong
while i admit, i LOLed at that... i still don't think we really have enough research to prove that eugenics is really a thing.
i'm all for children all growing up in a loving environment which encourages education and hard work. If we study multiple 'races' with these same environments, we'd have better data.
It encourages genetic defectives who are immoral to gain more money. People who are evil who break or bend laws and cut corners manage to grab more wealth.
@Aero homogeneity is non negotiable
being 'evil' is subjective and changes with the times.
subjectivity doesn't exist, what exists is a gradation of understanding of truth
? O.o truth changes from person to person. facts do not
to state universally all things are subjective perception is invoking a transcendental in universal truth
You're off your rocker mate.
for example if I say "there is no truth" that is a truth claim
no I am just smarter than you, so you are confused
Value is subjective, bruh.
wrong, value in economics I would say is based on something tangible and real, production as a process
hence why I think currency should be based on production function, it's not so different from Smith's labor as value theory
There are no utils.
i'd like to make this clear on economics: economists are essentially the modern-day alchemists. they "know" nothing for a fact. if they claim to, they are either delusional, or lying. they are fortune tellers who shout out when they are right and gloss over anything they are wrong about.
well, a lot of modern economics is based on theoretical speculation and math autism, but there's certain aspects to it which are real
production is a tangible real thing
yes, there is a real backbone to economics, but most of that is just the basics.
the basics are more salient as you get to the higher levels ironically
t.econ graduate school student
Value depends on purpose. Purpose depends on the individual. Collective consciousness is a spook.