hence why I think currency should be based on production function, it's not so different from Smith's labor as value theory

There are no utils.

i'd like to make this clear on economics: economists are essentially the modern-day alchemists. they "know" nothing for a fact. if they claim to, they are either delusional, or lying. they are fortune tellers who shout out when they are right and gloss over anything they are wrong about.

well, a lot of modern economics is based on theoretical speculation and math autism, but there's certain aspects to it which are real

https://youtu.be/17DkMDvKqw0

production is a tangible real thing

yes, there is a real backbone to economics, but most of that is just the basics.

the basics are more salient as you get to the higher levels ironically

t.econ graduate school student

Value depends on purpose. Purpose depends on the individual. Collective consciousness is a spook.

i'd classify production part of the basics. but keep in mind, humans have a social aspect to them. homogeneity may make things easier, but will almost certainly not make things better.

individualism is a spook propagated by jewish intellectuals

Hitler was a Jew

@Aero I would argue economics is itself a branch of moral philosophy

the problem is capitalists are amoral or immoral

Science is amoral.

yes, which is the problem, there is no ascendancy principle

simply finding shit out is retarded because certain paths diverge into dangerous technologies which can end civilization (ai as example)

btw regulating technologies like nanotech, ai etc will require dictatorship or absolute monarchy

so either way we are necessary to the current structure and tech of society

Honestly can't tell if you're shitposting.

I'd have to get more into moral philosophy myself, but reading some chinese literature makes me think that there is no truly moral way of thinking that will not change in the future.

There is, it's called traditional Christianity in league with an authoritarian state.

Blasphemy.

I'm not shitposting. I reject all modern liberal ideas.

I genuinely think that enlightenment was the worst thing to happen to Europe.

Actually this is a prot American bullshit idea of separation of church and state. In trad Christianity state collaborates with church in symphonia.

They work together, where on upholds theological rules the other extends the sword to prevent degeneracy and keep social order.

so... you're for a Theocracy?

this prevents any king or dictator from going too far

No, it's a synergy of state and church working together.

Neither has dominance over other. A theocracy would be church run.

by virtue of the commandments of christianity, a state cannot hold equal authority to the book.

there is no 'working together'

I believe in the interim we need a transitional period of neo absolutism, or third position dictatorship with a religious focus.

The existence of a state violates the commandments.

@Aero The state upholds moral law, but it has final say on other matters.

In Christianity all rulers are ultimately given authority from heaven. Even the bad ones. So the church must respect the state.

Likewise in a nation of converts the dictator cannot go too far, as the church would protest

Satanist propaganda.