Message from @Vril-Gesellschaft
Discord ID: 545670651701100560
indeed, which is another failsafe
>implying brazil is garbage because of its genetic makeup instead of the travesty that was the toppling of the monarchy
toppling of monarchy was part of it, allowing millions of low tier people to live there contributed more
States can't implement eugenics, only dysgenics.
incorrect, eugenics can be implemented, and in relatively non invasive ways
you don't need to gas the defectives, that doesn't even work due to gene drift in mean reversion
capitalism and liberal ideals are dysgenic though
Capitalism is peak eugenics.
wrong
while i admit, i LOLed at that... i still don't think we really have enough research to prove that eugenics is really a thing.
i'm all for children all growing up in a loving environment which encourages education and hard work. If we study multiple 'races' with these same environments, we'd have better data.
It encourages genetic defectives who are immoral to gain more money. People who are evil who break or bend laws and cut corners manage to grab more wealth.
@Aero homogeneity is non negotiable
being 'evil' is subjective and changes with the times.
subjectivity doesn't exist, what exists is a gradation of understanding of truth
? O.o truth changes from person to person. facts do not
to state universally all things are subjective perception is invoking a transcendental in universal truth
You're off your rocker mate.
for example if I say "there is no truth" that is a truth claim
no I am just smarter than you, so you are confused
Value is subjective, bruh.
wrong, value in economics I would say is based on something tangible and real, production as a process
hence why I think currency should be based on production function, it's not so different from Smith's labor as value theory
There are no utils.
i'd like to make this clear on economics: economists are essentially the modern-day alchemists. they "know" nothing for a fact. if they claim to, they are either delusional, or lying. they are fortune tellers who shout out when they are right and gloss over anything they are wrong about.
well, a lot of modern economics is based on theoretical speculation and math autism, but there's certain aspects to it which are real
production is a tangible real thing
yes, there is a real backbone to economics, but most of that is just the basics.
the basics are more salient as you get to the higher levels ironically
t.econ graduate school student
Value depends on purpose. Purpose depends on the individual. Collective consciousness is a spook.
i'd classify production part of the basics. but keep in mind, humans have a social aspect to them. homogeneity may make things easier, but will almost certainly not make things better.
individualism is a spook propagated by jewish intellectuals
Hitler was a Jew
@Aero I would argue economics is itself a branch of moral philosophy
the problem is capitalists are amoral or immoral
Science is amoral.
yes, which is the problem, there is no ascendancy principle
simply finding shit out is retarded because certain paths diverge into dangerous technologies which can end civilization (ai as example)
btw regulating technologies like nanotech, ai etc will require dictatorship or absolute monarchy
so either way we are necessary to the current structure and tech of society