Message from @Lagomaster24
Discord ID: 464926341482151936
but i beleive anyone whos not happy with sargon being in ukip is justified if at best he changes the party into his own ideal rather than what people who origenally joined ukip wanted it to be
@vlnc.co absolute ownership as the baseline, but any agreement can be negotiated with anybody with any contracts to change that .... the point is that i am arguing for explicit consent for anything property related
Thats true the Dems might be doing it to them moreso
ooo I was kinda sorta not really but kinda mentioned in tim's new video 😛
i dont think ukip is the kind of party that likes the methods of "success by any means nessicary"
under the label "people on my discord" 😛
Dems are lost
no one who makes you pay to become a member would be
Rn in gb ukip has unique chance to claim back to beeing 3rd most influential party
Because of how brexit is going
i mean, if i open up a water store with newly purified water from my innovative inventions..... and i want to sell the water.... im not goign to be like... NOPE I OWN THE WATER .... I AM ABSOLUTE OWNER
But they need to get their message out
And possibly even organize some demonstrations
Sargon and his band could play impprtant role in all of this
Dems will stay relevant but they are pushing further left jsut as the Repubs did when the Tea Party essentially took over
the limits need to be stipulated and consented to in order for it to be a legitimate limit on ownerships.... obvious ppl can be co-owners of private property
It could also end as nothing
Main reason i want to have a Moderate Party lol
As i said its all open
teh democrat socialist american workers party
I think we should all get together to found the Authoritarian party (just because the Libertarian Party already exists)
demsoc of oceana
Im just glad they are getting into the thick of it now
no though... democracy is just mob rule..... ochlocracy .. it does not depend on your consent
Dont remind me of the 1984 parallels lol
@Poptarts right but in a micro private governance, what if there is a tribe that lives downstream that also has water tech but your tribe is polluting that stream with your tech? some problems may indeed be better resolved in a micro govt with greater consensus and consent, but some decisions have macro-effects. such as pollution
what in the fuck is an ochlocracy
they already got the logo
And any Authoritarian party candidate for President should run "for Dictator"
I know they do it creeps me out
Monarchy
lel
I dont think people run for "dictator" 😛
they just take it
they do, they just dont say they do
i dont think its a silver bullet at all
yes, there would be naturally emerging systems of dealing with hierarchical disputes, resolutions, and arbitration
Dems have a chance to keep to many far leftist out but they are running out of time
I don't mean they should actually try to become a dictator, I just mean that should be their campaign message
"I'm running for Dictator"