Message from @pratel
Discord ID: 468704861697998879
In 1975.
Nearly half a century ago
Australia had their duly elected prime minister dismissed due to little more than bad poll numbers and a gridlocked legislature
and Australia just laid down and took it
And then the minority party's leader was put into power as head of government
Sounds interesting
and as far as I know, this is an area where Canada and Australia have virtually identical laws
The Queen meddled with us in the past a bit, but it was mostly political bullshit our politicians were asking for.
Canada's armed forces swear allegiance to the Queen personally
as do Canadian politicans
Yes, because we were both previously colonies
I cant say you're wrong in terms of laws
so they cannot, legally, object to her exercising her full authority
But in terms of practice i staunchly believe you're way off.
We can illegally, very loudly object to it
And we would
nah, Canada is cucked
you'd kneel to the queen
I find it hard to believe that Canada is independent of the UK bearing these factors in mind
Really, it depends on the circumstance.
If what she did had wide popular approval
You're probably right
That was the case with Australia
Doesn't even need wide popular approval. Just enough to make revolt inpractical.
however you define 'revolt'
The prime minister was unpopular enough that the people didn't complain when a perfectly law-abiding politician was suddenly and swiftly ejected from the office they were duly elected to serve in
at least according to polling
Even if the people DID revolt, it's not like the Canadian armed forces swear allegiance to Canadian law
or people
or politicians
But in practice the Queen doesnt excercise a whole lot of power here, and if she did try to do something widely unpopular she'd be putting herself in a precarious situation i imagine
They swear allegiance only to the Queen
But she DID exercise this power in practice in 1975
So what's to stop her from doing it again?
Yeah, but show me a Canadian that'd actually answer to the Queen instead of the nation when it mattered
Who the military swears alliance to is more of a formality than a reality.
Don't give political power to someone purely because they came out of the right vagina
It shows where power nominally rests and the traditions and culture lie, but it says very little about how things might operate in a true crisis.
That's rich coming from someone whose screenname starts with "Swedish"
This is more a matter of us inheriting this governmental structure, and so long as the Queen just stays quiet, it doesnt hurt us much to keep it.