🇨🇦 🔫 🇺🇸

By the way, hello.

If you insist!

So, we gonna outline the next War Plan Red or what?

Especially the Crimson part

the full War Plan Red if Labor has its way in the UK

Is Manifest Destinism considered extremism these days? 🤔

I was already brought here via a screencap from a person who's presumably a member here

But yeah, full disclosure, I'm an annexationist as a direct result of believing that the US system of government is the greatest system of government ever designed.

Er, I suppose on this side it's more technically correct to say expansionism, rather than annexationism

Annexationism refers to movements outside the US to get annexed by the US

Parti 51 in Quebec, for example, is an annexationist party

as is the Federalist Party in the Philippines

I've been called a Manifest Destinist before, and I wear that label proudly.

Canada, as a monarchy, is a scar on the American continents.

@WeWillNeverYield This but unironically

Not the world, just the Americas

(and much of the Pacific)

Europe can continue to burn

As soon as I can attach images, I have a picture of "Planet America"

Oh, kickass

In that case, I'd like to propose Texasing Canada

That is, using demographic displacement to our BENEFIT

We greatly outnumber Canadians

So we could concievably move up there en masse to the point of outnumbering Canadians, calling for a referendum to get annexed by the US, and bam

We used to be excellent at two things

1) moving into areas and then calling for annexation into the US once there (e.g. Hawaii, Texas, etc.)

2) suppressing independence movements (Philippines, Puerto Rico, etc.)

With Canada making un-Americanism such a large part of their national identity, one must logically assume that Canada is either anti-Americanist, or is actively working against improving their country.

And if it's the former, to have an anti-American nation on our border, with such a large and unguarded border, is hazardous.

UUUU

>yfw the Trump Curse results in Canada politically destabilizing under Trudeau

Trudeau announces that because Canada is post-nationalism, he has no objection to Canada being annexed into the US as a region

Look, all I'm saying is that a US border with Belize and Guatemala would be much shorter, and thus be cheaper to build the fuck out of and easier to guard, than the current border with Mexico

ALL I'M SAYING is that we should CONSIDER annexing Mexico in its entirety, and turning it into an unorganized, unincorporated territory for a few generations.

Exactly

@WeWillNeverYield Like I said, we can guard the US/Belize-Guatamala border very easily

Mexico is basically just an unfortunate trade node that produces neither the guns nor the drugs within it

Our bigger cocnern should be the South American nations actually producing the drugs

So if we keep annexing southward, we can ever reverse Jimmy Carter's idiocy by re-annexing the Panama Canal

@Autistic Dog Like I said, if we make Mexico an unorganized, unincorperated territory for a few generations, we can make them American nationals, NOT American citizens

After sufficient Americanization, THEN we can make them citizens

And we can Americanize them via the same public school system that was used to Americanize the Irish catholics

@WeWillNeverYield The Philippines is the most pro-American nation on Earth

Reannexing them would likely be passively welcomed, honestly

@Autistic Dog Got a source on that?

It's more to do with the fact that the Philippines preferred American rule to Spanish, Japanese, or their own rule

@! Q ! The Philippines' three biggest problems are drugs, Islamic terrorism, and communist terrorism. They're just like us tbh.

@Autistic Dog The Philippines has had a widely recognized corruption problem since the 60's

The country fell flat on its face after a 10-20-year promising start, and the populace knows it.

>yfw the Weinstein probe turns into McCarthy 2.0

Please, God, let the Weinstein probe turn into McCarthy 2.0

Hollywood needs to be purged of socialists and communists again

>yfw Michael Bay is completely innocent

Trying to recall whether Chuck Norris was fully sensible in his political views

I know he's at least sensible-ish

@Deleted User 904fdf23 >studying British slang

>being this much of a monarchist

The British are a political trainwreck.

Even trying to fix British politics to a state of normalcy would just result in a fundamentally pre-enlightenment political system

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Montreal_Annexation_Manifesto

Let's talk more about annexing Quebec, then

Quebec would give us grounds to contest the St. Lawrence Seaway going forward

We should get the CIA on the case of making sure Parti 51 wins

So, how long until Sargon is forced to give his talk on British identity in the United States? <:thronk:441701565607444482>

After all, wasn't one of the reasons he chose Scarborough in order to make deplatforming less likely? Or am I remembering that backwards?

Actually, he might legitimately be able to file for asylum in the United States due to political opinion

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/qualifying-asylum-based-persecution-imputed-political-opinion.html

Imputed political opinion at that

e.g. leftists calling him a Nazi or whatnot

The Anti-Kommunist Action flag

a parody of the Antifa flag

From a march, I think

Day For Freedom or something

At least that's about when he got it

I wanted to hear his talk on British identity, particularly since I submitted a quote that could be used in it from here in the US

**[Laughs in American]**

It'll actually be interesting to see which American websites decide "Fuck this" and pull out of the EU outright

This is nothing new for the UK

Look at The North Briton, Issue 45

or the fact that under British seditious libel laws, truth was *not* a defense

laws that apparently only ended in 2009, if the source I read that from was accurate.

I personally think Europe's doomed to be a perpetual powder keg

I think the root problem with the UK is its monarchism, a problem intensified by its lack of written constitution

A lot of these secondary "solutions" wouldn't even be legal with something comparable to a Bill of Rights

a bill of rights that can't simply be undone with a later contradicting law and some "Common Law" interpretation aswith the Communications Act of 2003

I agree with Douglas, I just think there's an even deeper and more fundamental problem with the British legal system

politicians who don't swear allegiance to their citizens or British law

but instead personally swear allegiance to the British monarch

You just said that the politicians don't serve the people

That's because they're not supposed to

Yes, they do

```I, (Insert full name), do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.```

The PM certainly does when meeting with the monarch personally every week

```The British Prime Minister has a weekly audience with Elizabeth II, usually every Wednesday, during parliamentary time at Buckingham Palace.```

Weekly