Message from @>Cytos, de lieve goede synth
Discord ID: 473930186988191757
as soon as you make 2 results, it does not become statistics lmao
the point of the scientific method, is that a person can recreate it if they don't believe you,
And every time they do it they'll get the same result
there are tools to seperate yourself from your bias
resultS
Ok ok what i told you guys that panpsychism is becoming more and more academically credible?
even if to only make that bias apparant
so that others may recognise
plural results
You need resultS for the initial testing to confirm it
But anyone who doesn't believe you can run the same test once to see that the original hypothesis is true again
its the whole point, that anyone can recreate the test
I'd ask you for your sources
yes, but just testing it once is not going to prove or disprove anything
if medicine is only 80% accurate
1 out of every 5 tests will yield a different result
So if 50 scientists test it, 10 will have a different result (statistically)
That means that they wont get the same results 20% of the time
and testing things 2 or more times does not make it any less of a science
you can test it to confirm it
thats the whole point of it
If you don't believe it, you can retest it
a billion trilliong gazillion times
Idk if Thomas nagal.is any indication there are plenty who don't want anything other then nautealism to be true
but if the hypothesis is accurate it will yield the same results
only restesting when you dont get the results you want is bad form
So you're saying we have to test gravity every time we wake up?
im saying we test gravity a bunch of times in different scenarios every day
its predictable how it will behave
aka its science
A scientific theory gets accepted if many MANY people tested it and all got the same conclusion, meaning it has been tested thousands of times
Yet if you DON'T believe it, you can feel free to test it as many times as you want
and if you go into outer space and shit does not always fall the way you expect, then you make a new theory
but it still needs to be predictable
test it once, test it hundreds of times, its gonna be the same
so when you wake up in space you know what might happen
on average
no, thats a conclusion we draw based on tests we confirmed scientifically
@Mallic you mean the philosopher? That doesn't sound like much in the way of evidence to me
Simplified:
If i drop a bottle on earth, i confirm the test of gravity,
Knowing how gravity works, i can ASSUME that if i drop a brick on earth, it will apply the same effect,
If it doesn't, and i drop the brick and it flies off, it proves my hypothesis was wrong
what did you say about medicine again? that it was not science?
its statistics, because i can't predict its endings with certainty
if that is your standard, which you can believe it to be
then only math is a science
and physics and chemistry
nope
yes it is