Message from @d3adlyz3bra
Discord ID: 476058819235938324
fb has a valid reason to ban him
For all we know, its either automated due to mass flagging
Problem is, if that is valid, why havent they banned the other sites that say worse.
Sure, if its valid, ban IW
But if its being enforced selectively, now thats a problem
You either ban none or ban them all
Apple also has a valid reason. They all implemented "hate speech" policies to their platform
ToS are dangerous
and they have the right to ban whoever cuz the platforms are not public domain meaning free speech doesnt apply to them.
there are companies who update their ToS just to ban someone
Its.. also a contractual agreement made between two parties
I.. dont think his banning is the issue here.
lookin at you wizards
The issue is why other offenders are not being banned
because they arent as big as him....
The selective enforcement
and in such a huge spotlight
technically once you get so big, selective enforcement is your only way to go
because you require people to report
Then wouldnt that make the idea that it was a mass flag campaign more valid.
all these platforms are private companies and have the right to kick whoever they want off their platforms.
but people abuse the system
moderating is a clusterfuck
That private company defense ceases to work when they want to be a public utility.
there is no way to not selectively enforce things outside of out right ban anyone just off one report
and then you end up with no users
or so many alts there is no point in moderating
And its most likely not something automated.
doesnt make them a public forum still meaning free speech doesnt apply to them
it can be automated to a point, i.e. enough flags over the course of x time for x reason
Didnt tim say that youtube or facebook was using infowars as a trusted form for news
i don't think any of those companies want to be a public utility
do the ToS even define hate speech? Who is next?
not unless they want to be regulated to hell and back
A big account being deleted needs to be signed off 100% sure
And probably should. Companies also know they make more money enabling this
given the fact recent regulations have already started attacking them where it hurts, their pockets and user data collection, i doubt they would want to be public utilities
No point complaining if they enforced their TOS. Its their right afterall.
facebook's definition of hate speech
is white men still a protected class?