Everyone gets the minimum housing,

If you want more, you can add it

But when you add it, you then are "richer" than others, so must share that new part of your house with everyone

like QM2 😄

that is a problem if you don't like the idea of throwing someone out into the cold in winter knowing full well they will most likely die

people tend to see that as akin to murder sometimes

pesky morals

But no one is stopping you from housing that person yourself

One time, I crushed a crab with my fist on the beach.

well, depends. Sometimes there is

homeless shelter are already a thing, why not expand that and charity, why make gov do it though. Not to mention many of the people not going to shelter choose not to

I'm late to this conversation but

@Grenade123 how so? Genuinely curious

Are you advocating for growing government ANYTHING?

Have you ever been to the DMV?

we discussing the communism

I can honestly say that I have never been to the Department of Motor Vehicles

Commies?!

People don't grasp that the government has no funding aside from taxes, to them its just "Government has money, let them take care of the homeless, and if they need more money, well theres rich people who own 99% who you can get it from"

LEMME AT EM

@Dan V i said sometimes. city ordinances, property owners. IF you fully own the land, then not really anyone.

**LEMME AT EM**

but, do you really own your land in any place you need to pay taxes?

to be honest, that is a different argument. @ExceptionalFeather. One over who is better at providing for the need. and i would agree charity does it better

ultimately you can only own rights to land

Nah, I guess not. You rent the land from the government by paying taxes

The government can go POUND SAND, that's my motto.

I tell government to cut the malarky at every opportunity.

hell, the police keep you from housing fugitives no?

@Grenade123 I thought we were discussing commies and shelter as a human right though

plant a flag and claim land under your sovereignty, then be prepared to defend it from the country you just conquered the soil from 😉

like i said, they are not too far off base with it being close to a right. where they are off base, is who is better at providing it

ah

Yeah but a criminal would lose some rights

You know...like prisoners

ah.... but who says you are criminal?

I think we're nitpicking here

A jury of your peers

do they?

i don't think the federal government is even close to being my peer.

I think that former prisoners should not have their rights take away

most of my peers think pot is mostly fine

if the fed is my peer,

The fed should be in jail 😄