Message from @Grenade123

Discord ID: 476511992090329089


2018-08-07 22:02:36 UTC  

So, here is a question. If a controversial figure that most people dislike and want banned, decidea to delete all his social media, then claim these sites banned him... Would the sites take credit?

2018-08-07 22:03:07 UTC  

depends on how profitable it is

2018-08-07 22:03:56 UTC  

if the messages wont give it away, i dont think the site admins would be that clever or care

2018-08-07 22:04:34 UTC  

But you see, to not take credit means they were willing to let the person remain on the platform

2018-08-07 22:04:45 UTC  

To take credit, gets them in with popular opinion

2018-08-07 22:04:48 UTC  

So they're in the same position as the day before

2018-08-07 22:05:04 UTC  

again, i think they are too dumb to foresee this, especially youtube

2018-08-07 22:05:26 UTC  

They probably wouldn't look so bad when everyone is focused on how the other guy lied to appear victimized

2018-08-07 22:05:38 UTC  

And if they opt to stay silent, they let the public believe they did ban them

2018-08-07 22:05:48 UTC  

I wouldn't be surprised if something like that happened, but I wouldn't expect it to.

2018-08-07 22:06:20 UTC  

well i can see them just staying silent

2018-08-07 22:06:26 UTC  

They probably wouldn’t take credit, or even talk about it honestly. Better to just let it happen

2018-08-07 22:06:50 UTC  

So let someone claim they were banned

2018-08-07 22:06:59 UTC  

youtube are experts at being silent about what they are doing

2018-08-07 22:07:05 UTC  

^^^

2018-08-07 22:07:11 UTC  

Googles really good at it

2018-08-07 22:07:23 UTC  

No, YouTube is exports at telling you the exact opposite.of what they are doing

2018-08-07 22:07:31 UTC  

Well that too

2018-08-07 22:07:41 UTC  

Good to have two skills right?

2018-08-07 22:07:53 UTC  

ok, but are they smart about it?

2018-08-07 22:08:32 UTC  

for the record, i doubt this is what happened to jones, i'm just questioning what would happen if some other controversial person tried it.

2018-08-07 22:08:38 UTC  

like when milo was still in his prime

2018-08-07 22:08:38 UTC  

sure

2018-08-07 22:09:21 UTC  

would they remain silent? how much bad PR would need to be generated in order for them to admit to not banning him

2018-08-07 22:09:58 UTC  

would the PR teams respond with a canned message they respond to most banning before the investigative team figured out they didn't ban them?

2018-08-07 22:12:58 UTC  

it's not impossible they could attempt to take credit, i suppose

2018-08-07 22:14:09 UTC  

technically a pr canned message isn't even taking credit intentionally, its just the classic "WHY DID YOU BAN SOMEONE?!" reply. which is "hey, we've kicked a bunch of people recently for this, so probably this."

2018-08-07 22:14:57 UTC  

yeah

2018-08-07 22:18:07 UTC  

black pidgeon speaks might be a day late but he finally put his video out on infowars

2018-08-07 22:18:28 UTC  

its so well done that i might get banned from a few discord servers because they cant handle the truth

2018-08-07 22:47:55 UTC  

i don't understand .... if founders of most companies are men and thier is lack of female leadership at said company why do women complain about it ? why not just found thier own company > ?

2018-08-07 22:48:28 UTC  

cuz they want the complaint points and gifts.

2018-08-07 22:49:10 UTC  

and uh, making a successful company is hard.

2018-08-07 22:49:22 UTC  

a lot harder than whining about the man for handouts

2018-08-07 22:49:24 UTC  

if i founded a company id give them my cummies after they gave me a bj

2018-08-07 22:50:53 UTC  

they'd #metoo the fuck out of me

2018-08-07 23:01:37 UTC  

when are the democrats gonna censor ocasio cortez ?

2018-08-07 23:01:49 UTC  

like tim sed the dems dont like her they need to censor her

2018-08-07 23:01:50 UTC  

because they are lazy and don't actually believe they are being discriminated against

2018-08-07 23:05:02 UTC  

You make jokes about that