Message from @NativeInterface
Discord ID: 479663486977179669
Cannibalism exists in nature, does that mean we shouldn't have a stance on it?
so, the question: what other aspects, is an attempt at clarification of your position that the term is being used correctly over the possibly more accurate phrase child molestation
or rapist
which, i would agree, is what most people think of first when they think pedophile. and then add things later that lead up to that, but only after the fact.
child rape should be legal, but only by animals
I think people do use the term incorrectly, to a degree, which is why it has such a strong connotation to it.
Personally I wish that pedophiles could feel safer seeking help from professionals, but it seems near impossible a way to really make that possible without risking normalizing pedophilia
nah if the animal rapes a child the animal owner should be held responsible
I agree @Schedrevka
same
I agree with the green bird as well.
Owen Benjamin does children NO FAVORS when he says "Guys we can't risk it. You gotta go. Two shots to the back of the head. Helicopter rides. YOU GOTTA GO"
Wow gee.
Is it any mystery they seek help so inoften.
Faggots.
the only real assurances you need if you do suffer from pedo tendensies, is the fact that psychologists vowed to not talk about what is said in sessions with them in a way that identifies you
Lel
I think it's possible for someone to seek help, but with the stigma attached to it (and it evokes a strong negative reaction from most people) I can see why some would choose to just not talk about it at all.
if that is not enough, nothing ever will
Re: things that fall under pedophilia but don't have to involve someone groping a kid? Having nudie pics of children on your computer. Not a grey area
I think pedophilia is probably much more common than people think, just like many people have violent fantasies. I mean look at Japan, or look at what happens in the countries where pedophilia is not as demonized. Or look at ancient Rome
i mean they literally lose their license when they speak about confedential info from a session
Actually I've heard they have to alert the authorities on this issue.
Well, you had Salon publish a bunch of articles praising 'virtuous pedophiles'
It's part of policy that pedophilia is different from anything else.
I believe that they have to if they believe that a crime is imminent or someone's in danger.
At least in some areas. I get hazier on the details there.
Also we don't have to normalize mental illness for people to get treatment.
I could be wrong, though, and it could just be an auto-call to the authorities
we might as well talk about normalizing being tall
Don't hang out with tall people.
They'll make you tall.
It's fucked up.
The difference being that tall people, as a demographic, are not a danger to children.
They get it because they or someone in their life sees it as a problem
the only time when a psychologist is allowed to disclose information about a session, is when there is a credible fear of (self) harm
But then you get people like the couple who biked across the midle east...
There would be those who would say "yeah I have a virtuous pedophile babysitter to show it's ok"
there is a two parts here. I think attraction to what we call children, but are humans that have started to and/or gotten at least half way through puberty is way more common than we care to admit, and may not be an actual disease but an undesirable by-product of when a 15 yo was an adult and having kids. Then there is attraction to those before puberty, which probably is a mental disorder.
pedophile is an attribute that describes the psychology of a person, isn't it