exacty ^

It is a simple determination of specific principle.

I always choose the part of the trolly running out of power

fuck you, kirk.

😛

lmao

turn that power off then hijack it so i win s

"just fire two photon torpedos we need to conserve ammo"

so.... communist/socialist advocate for polices that violate human rights as declared by the UN (as much of a joke as they are) http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html

"Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property."

FUCK THE UN REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE^

hey, left believes in the UN right? so you can use it against them

A sufficiently communist person could read that and find no contradiction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnxkfLe4G74 Good song btw.

how? they don't believe in ownership of property

ABOLISH PROFIT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
ABOLISH THE BORDERS REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I wonder what will happen if we give them that because you sure as hell know they wont stop at that shit

"Article 19.


Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

I feel so damn bad for Europe.

"I own my car, I also own my car in association with others"

there is yuge missing BUUUUT in there Grenade

"I own my car" will get you kicked out of communism.

Refining words, sometimes to the point of using different definitions in different places in the same sentence, is a normal part of post-modernism.

One does not simply get kicked out of communism.

you right

they get unpersoned and disappear

putin did nothing wrong

But you see comrade, all property is owned by the state, but the state is the collective of the proletariat. So while I may own my car, you also own my car.

"Article 30.


Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein."

http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/36cons04.html#chap10

James Veitch?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5d8pVg3Qtg

"Article 12.


No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks."

man, the left just loves violating human rights

ARTICLE 127. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. are guaranteed inviolability of the person. No person may be placed under arrest except by decision of a court or with the sanction of a procurator.

ARTICLE 128. The inviolability of the homes of citizens and privacy of correspondence are protected by law.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGz93tJY-EI

See? No problem here comrade.

Tim's famous

we've already seen Vee's response. It's rather Vee.

rrrrromania

Anyone here know how to do calligraphy