E2D2
Discord ID: 310959617456865280
449 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/5
| Next
makes sense for them to go for independence
Self governance, remaining within the EU
that was a key factor in their last referendum
A gay sex tape
They've been building up in independence support for a couple centuries I believe
Since the 1800s excuse me
From wanting their own Parliament to independence
penis
Where TF is our gift from N. Korea?
Imagine
If he is, i'd be down to buy the first ever issued white house sex tape
everytime I come here, I keep finding less of a reason to look at politics
wtf
^ exactly. Melania isn't real. Goddam liberals
I wish
Yea, all police aren't racist because of your one example of the ethnic composition of the New Mexican police force
quality comeback
~~because people aren't as retarded as you~~ because thats not what a war is
shit then I guess the mailman delivering the wrong letters to my house for the past year can be considered an act of war lol
as I am the leader of my property and what is tampered with it
Hold up, you're giving me a list of idioticly and *actually* declared wars to prove that the population increase and movements of africans could be declared an act of war?
How does that make sense?
bruh you don't think Ninja would make a good leader? Sad
well now I have to disagree with you
@Unity.Nat you do know that's not how it works right? The house voted and concluded their vote of impeachment. He's been impeached. Sending it to the senate is not the impeachment, it's the vote that the house conducted.
1975 scientists when global warming was heavily debated vs current scientists where climate change (the now overall carbon emmissions effect on the world) are not the same scientists running off the same info
They've adapted, grown, and developed their studies and have reached a point surrounding the enviornment
@luduma you can look up UN enviornmental reports or Google up enviornmental reports and see them yourself
Wait who's got money on him?
@TobaccoMike yo where you betting that money?
What?
I'm gonna check that out
Thanks
Same thing said when the Irish, Germans, Italians, Mexicans, Vietnamese, Chinese, etc. all had their waves of moving to the US.
This is some of the greatest skeptical shit I've heard in a while
I liked the "hunted down like whites by blacks in South Africa"
That's why I'm interested in theses sources of his
@!GoldenKingship! also get the South Africa one
Roberts?
thats about environmental refugees, not about the state of the environment
try again
you do know there has always been a majority of blacks in south africa over whites right?
here is an actual wiki source on it
I said you can look up environmental reports on how scientist discuss the effects of carbon emissions on the environment and you pulled a completely different topic out of nowhere.
Also, people become refugees for more than just the environment. I hope you know that
I am not
How are they unreliable then since that is your claim
over the entire span of history or recently? I could say there could have been
between droughts, floods, and other changes to communities that make it hard for people to live there perhaps
legally?
oh damn, who knew. So since even you know that the climate has been changing you recognize that it is trending towards more extreme weather that we have not seen before right? And that mankind has a hand in how the earth is changing as well right?
like, no shit climate changes but since industrialization there have been increasing changes
idk, he's right
you gotta do your duty
thats how it works. The senate has never convicted a president out of office
**Published Mar 30, 2005**
*This page contains archived content and is no longer being updated. At the time of publication, it represented the best available science.*
literally above the first sentence
First, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will probably boost temperatures over most land surfaces, though the exact change will vary regionally
another line in your article
More uncertainโbut possibleโoutcomes of an increase in global temperatures include increased risk of drought and increased intensity of storms, including tropical cyclones with higher wind speeds, a wetter Asian monsoon, and, possibly, more intense mid-latitude storms. (For more information, see Global Warming: Potential Effects of Global Warming)
that one is at the end of that first paragraph
You provided the article. I am proving not only that its outdate, but to cherry pick the first sentence as an argument when numerous portions of that same article is proving points of climate change isn't helping your case buddy. @luduma
but if you want I can provide more *updated* information
idk because NASA isn't the only one who studies the climate
uhhhh NASA made a report on climate change as recent as Dec 13 2019 btw
like this one is the overall studies by NASA on climate change
you mean by scientific groups or by individuals? @Solicitor
as far as I know from initial looks it is a composition of scientific groups and their research
yea the video has a thumbnail of Obama, Greta Thurenberg or whatever and supposedly other environmentalists as well as its not playing
Are you asking me to tell you what the studies are concluding or what they think?
Im just providing an updated source from NASA on climate change for the other guy
might be better if you ask them
you can contact them if you want. Shoot them an email or something
not only NASA scientist. I believe on my link you can contact them through that
im wataching the video chill out
I'll answer your questions later
the one about Obama and his tweet apparently
this video doesn't tackle the more recent declaration that 99% of scientists say that climate change has mankind influencing it, as well as this only discusses the rumor of the 97% tweet and stating that the papers that didn't include the word "mankind" or "global warming" were thus against the claim of climate change
@Solicitor what is it?
Yea i've apparently heard differently from you
I got this first, but its apparently a dispute
I think Feb
what about them?
aren't polar bears moving further south to look for food?
adaptation and the shifting of the poles kind of helps expand their living space and in accordance, their population
When I meant south I meant lower than the arctic circle
like the numerous reports in Russia about them moving into or past siberian towns that have never seen them
they don't solely live on the ice in the north pole you know that
They live in tundras and other relatively lower temperature areas
Like I said, they have been moving further south in search for food for example. Polar bears have always moved between the arctic circle and tundra areas depending on the seasons in the northern hemisphere. They can still grow in population, its their food source that is shifting that is the concern with the polar bear pop. If your vision on climate change is focused on the increasing amount of polar bears there are, you might want to also look at the displacement of their main food sources rather than just the number of polar bears that exist.
Polar bears move *in search of food*
yes that is what *you* said
Im not saying every polar bear that moves finds the exact source of food they need or are getting their dietary requirements. For all I know they could be travelling south and eating whatever meat they find in those areas.
but why are they moving because of food? why is there more food there?
thats your statement
ok? I still quoted your statement.
I believe you are asking "What percentage of the climate is affected by people?"
449 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 4/5
| Next