@Seeker of Truth the Heliocentric model is a lie... based on?

@Seeker of Truth if this whole globe earth is a lie, and Gravity is lie as well... what would you replace Gravity with?

@Seeker of Truth You too (:

@rivenator12113 um... first of all, do you know what Theory is?

@rivenator12113 um... ok... first of all... Gravity can be measured... (don't have a real good replacement so far) cavendish is an experiment as far as a i aware... not only that please.... really... you can't observe gravity effect on us?

@rivenator12113 So if gravity isn't a vailed option... what will replace Gravity on fe?

@rivenator12113 if gravity isn't a vailed option... what will replace Gravity on fe??

@rivenator12113 who made another acc?

@rivenator12113 oh ok... for my question if gravity isn't a vailed option... what will replace Gravity on fe?

@rivenator12113 okay... that means that everything going upwards at 9.8 m\s2

@rivenator12113 Flat earthers believes in RD as well, but what you believe in?

@rivenator12113 relative density

and buoyancy

@rivenator12113 So you believe in the earth going upwards at 9.8 right?

@rivenator12113 so... you 100% sure Gravity isn't real... but you don't know for sure what can replace it.

@rivenator12113 well... you see... we can observe things attracted horizontally... the only thing can explain that (So far) is only Gravity, none of the other fe replacement can.

@rivenator12113 ok, so if you not sure about that, it's fine. let me ask you other quesiton, if you won't mind.

Elaborate? what that means XD sorrry

oh ok

Well... cavendish experiment shows that pretty easily.

you can recreate the experiment if you think he's faking it or something

@rivenator12113 a person did the experiment with rocks, and showed no magnets are involved...

@rivenator12113 again you can recreate the experiment, and make sure it's working

@rivenator12113 I don't think being vacuum sealed is necessary, but again if you really want to experiment things by yourself, do it you will find the same result will happen.

@rivenator12113 btw. have to ask...according to fe model the sun is disappearing because of the sun getting further away and getting smaller to the point of not seeing it. but in reality the sun ain't changing it's size drastically as it should according to fe model. so..

@Deleted User omg....

that means

chris hemsworth ain't real?

@rivenator12113 No refraction have nothing to do with it... as far as i aware.

@rivenator12113 what... do you mean... it's ain't working like it in reality.

@iZinoq it's a trick question...

@kino If density causes that... tell me why things attracted horizontally too? Density alone cannot explain that...

@kino Well... check again (falling it's not the best word to describe that)

@kino for instance, cavendish... his experiment can be recreated at home... not only that this experiment recreated in schools sometimes... and no magnets have nothing to do with that as you can easily do it with non magnetic materials...

@kino wow how would i disprove this AMAZING disprove for gravity...

@kino interesting... why do he uses this toys... why he didn't do that with rocks instead

@kino not this again XD Gravity is a weak force... it depends on a lot of things...

okay... this argument is useless, the guy repeating the same things over and over without even trying to understand our points...

@kino yup... im repeating the same thing...

@kino not you not... because you still wondering why things can "resist" earths Gravity....

@kino ok.

right

loo...

k

gravity is proportional force...

as @Σ5 explained 5 times

already

@Σ5 just leave it... you don't understand this is meaningless.

@kino okay... dude chill out, let say you right and Gravity isn't real\proven. what would you replace it with?

@kino nuh im fine xD the chill out was like let's stop typing a lot cuz we won't be able to answer to anyone

@kino now, what would you replace Gravity?

@kino okay.... explain how density explains to us why things accelerating downwards?

@kino yes, it doesn't explains why objects accelerating downwards...

@kino They should've just fall in consent speed

@rivenator12113 what do you mean... how that even makes them accelerate?

@rivenator12113 apple is denser than air... so it would fall, right? but what makes it accelerate...

@rivenator12113 no things accelerate at the same speed... 9.8m\s2. in a vacuum as someone said here before, you can put a feather and a 50 Kg ball and they will fall at the same speed...

@rivenator12113 yeah... but how it's have something to do with the "debate"? i said things accelerates downwards because of Gravity... and density has nothing to do with it, so how relative density is a vailed replacement?

@rivenator12113 nope... density wouldn't decide if something goes down or up or sideways, density wouldn't make object go faster (accelerate) density is almost meaningless without Gravity...

@kino things "fall down" because things attracted to the center of mass (our earth center of mass) down for us isn't down for someone else... density isn't capable of saying where an less dense thing will go or more dense thing will go, it working with gravity... Density ALONE is only an amount of matter an object has to its volume.... that's will not decide whether something "falls" or "rise"

@rivenator12113 go ahead, take a wooded ball and take a metal ball, drop them they will hit the ground at the same time (even in open air) (considering they have the same size,and dropped from the same height at the same time) explain... relative density says the denser will hit first... am i wrong?

@kino that you the one who don't have evidence...

yea...

which didn't help the debate... at all...

@kino of course i didn't...

@kino yup... probably...

@kino The fact we explained you... gave you experiment that you just ignored... shows how we just claiming stuff without proof... right?

cavendish.

@kino im waiting.

@kino for?

yes a lot...

history of flat earth.

where is it?

i found it

thnx

i will see what it all about

i think this is it"Now, the Cavendish experiment has been widely criticized by the scientific community because never in over two centuries since its creation has anyone been able to replicate it! Firstly, the balls simply do not always attract one another as they must for the so-called gravitational constant to be constant at all. Sometimes the torsion balance turns towards the balls and sometimes away as it is impossible not to give some slight tremulous motion when interacting with it."

i did...

That why i come up with the next question... how can you vitrify this info? that it couldn't be replicated, as far as i aware the experiment is replicated a lot... and even some record it...

@kino i think so...

@Jazz the unanswered question...

@kino why you avoiding the question?

@kino Why things "fall down" and not up? with only density acting on the objects it should be matter....

@kino how osmosis answers our question...

@kino We all feel stupid for not understanding how Density cab replace Gravity...

right

@SelimBap wait what was your question?

no...

@Seeker of Truth isn't they just filmed in "zero force" airplane?

I remember someone here mentioning it

@Seeker of Truth ok.

@sub-zero sandbox They have a working model of the sun and moon... however the real question is how the day - night works with the sun, the sun (in fe model) would have to shrink into the point of being so small that we will no longer see it (hence night) ... but it doesn't go smaller and smaller until it disappears, but stays the same size for all the day... that the thing i still didn't get an answer on...

@Jatsko Well... yeah it doesn't really represents reality... so i guess the model is wrong.

Why the sun ain't get smaller the further it goes away, but stays the same size for all the day?i didn't get any answer to that yet

@Emma 😝 amazing news

@Mathieus the Walking Witness "no scientific evidence for gravity" right...

@Mathieus the Walking Witness trolls? ok... so disagreeing with you = trolling, thanks for letting me know.

@Ronin just a tiny bit