Message from @ShadoW (D.F.J)

Discord ID: 612306730604298243


2019-08-17 15:23:23 UTC  

Gravity fits

2019-08-17 15:23:33 UTC  

And at least that has evidence

2019-08-17 15:23:41 UTC  

@rivenator12113 So you believe in the earth going upwards at 9.8 right?

2019-08-17 15:24:03 UTC  

I just believe but I don't think its 100% true.

2019-08-17 15:24:19 UTC  

Might be or not, I have no way of experimenting on it

2019-08-17 15:24:23 UTC  

That explains things better than density

2019-08-17 15:24:31 UTC  

@rivenator12113 so... you 100% sure Gravity isn't real... but you don't know for sure what can replace it.

2019-08-17 15:24:39 UTC  

Lol no way of experimenting

2019-08-17 15:25:00 UTC  

Yeah @ShadoW (D.F.J) I am still questioning, I don't know the truth for myself yet

2019-08-17 15:25:08 UTC  

.

2019-08-17 15:25:47 UTC  

@rivenator12113 you can do this test. Measure the rate that the horizon drops as you go up in altitude

2019-08-17 15:25:52 UTC  

@rivenator12113 well... you see... we can observe things attracted horizontally... the only thing can explain that (So far) is only Gravity, none of the other fe replacement can.

2019-08-17 15:26:05 UTC  

Use a theodolity

2019-08-17 15:27:02 UTC  

@rivenator12113 ok, so if you not sure about that, it's fine. let me ask you other quesiton, if you won't mind.

2019-08-17 15:27:06 UTC  

@ShadoW (D.F.J) >we can observe things attracted horizontally
Elaborate please

2019-08-17 15:27:40 UTC  

Elaborate? what that means XD sorrry

2019-08-17 15:27:51 UTC  

Explain your point more

2019-08-17 15:27:54 UTC  

oh ok

2019-08-17 15:27:59 UTC  

GoPro +Weather Balloon to Stratosphere - why are people dont doing this?

2019-08-17 15:28:07 UTC  

not*

2019-08-17 15:28:20 UTC  

Well... cavendish experiment shows that pretty easily.

2019-08-17 15:28:31 UTC  

I've seen far too many fish eye lens videos, I will have to do it myself

2019-08-17 15:28:39 UTC  

you can recreate the experiment if you think he's faking it or something

2019-08-17 15:29:11 UTC  

thats the point, Why aren't people dong it, pick a real camera, not a fish eye one etc, and do it, I think it would be great.

2019-08-17 15:29:59 UTC  

@Aberration Dwayne kellum

2019-08-17 15:30:01 UTC  

I'm really interested in it, I know it can work under normal conditions but I've never seen it under a magnetically shielded environment and within a vacuum. There's also the chance that they things that attracts them might be weakly charged magnets

2019-08-17 15:30:22 UTC  

That would repel just as likely

2019-08-17 15:30:39 UTC  

But there's always a repeatable attraction

2019-08-17 15:30:40 UTC  

@rivenator12113 a person did the experiment with rocks, and showed no magnets are involved...

2019-08-17 15:30:56 UTC  

Cavendish used nonmagnetic materials

2019-08-17 15:30:59 UTC  

@rivenator12113 again you can recreate the experiment, and make sure it's working

2019-08-17 15:31:06 UTC  

Many have improved since then

2019-08-17 15:31:50 UTC  

@ShadoW (D.F.J) I know it works under normal condition but if it is magnetically shielded and vacuum sealed I wonder if the results would be different.

2019-08-17 15:32:08 UTC  

Paul heyl did that

2019-08-17 15:32:10 UTC  

the Dwayne kellum video is good, shows a slight curve too -

2019-08-17 15:32:12 UTC  

Got the same result

2019-08-17 15:32:13 UTC  

@rivenator12113 I don't think being vacuum sealed is necessary, but again if you really want to experiment things by yourself, do it you will find the same result will happen.

2019-08-17 15:32:44 UTC  

These values for gravity were then used to orbit the earth

2019-08-17 15:32:58 UTC  

If they were wrong , orbit would've decayed

2019-08-17 15:34:04 UTC  

@Ishmael why do you think things fall?

2019-08-17 15:35:06 UTC  

@demonwarrior2266 attractive force between msss, per Newton's equation