@Pelth That's why slaves societies never had slave revolts, feudal societies never had peasant revolts, mercantilist society never had bourgeois revolution, and capitalist society has never had proletarian revolution

People just know their place

@3v6en8 Innovation according to human need

As opposed to innovation for the sake of personal gain

No, people won't be in headspaces where they're trained to ignore ethics and human suffering

I didn't go to college

Checkmate Libtard

Went straight into the workforce then got radicalized while working construction

@3v6en8 Can you honestly not conceive of working for a reason other than "Ah shit I want a wage"

No I'm black @Gоd

You can do that within capitalism

and you're much more likely to do that when your labor is largely meaningless

Within socialism money still exist

as would consumer goods

When you've achieved communism we're post scarcity and people would engage in labor either because it was necessary or because they wanted to

Like we no longer have resource scarcity

In the future when our means to produce are greater than our means to consume, we're already post-scarcity in things like food and housing

We just don't distribute them according to need

So there's still a homeless population and a starving strata of the population

As our productive output develops and we invent new ways of doing old task

300 years ago the idea that there'd be more than enough food and housing for all people was absurd, now it is reality. 300 years from now things like transportation and fuel will exist the same way

Especially with automation, our productive capacity is increasingly surpassing our ability to consume

hence post-scarcity

Not necessarily

But it will help us get there

Just when we reach the inevitable point where we reliable produce more than we consume, we'll have achieved post-scarcity \

Human sex isnt identical to human gender, and like what willow is saying, human sex doesn't even exist in a dichotomy

It is not reducible to male and female accurately

and gender absolutely cannot be reduced in that way accurately

Yes

What is human sex to you? @Pelth

That's a meme claim to me @DjPhoenix

@Pelth Why would you define it that narrowly?

^

What sex is a hermaphrodite?

Or someone with a set of chromosomes which doesn't result in a penis or a vagina?

Are they just sexless? Because according to your definition they have no sex @Pelth

Sure whatever

@Pelth Sex and gender are not identical concepts

Your genitals or chromosomes are not indicative of gender

Which includes presentation and identity

They've never really been identical concepts until the proliferation of Abrahamic religion. Many cultures, including Greek, African, and Indigenous American cultures have had concepts of gender separate from biological sex

It is not a new redefinition

What makes you say that? The differentiation dates back to ancient times @pompompiggy

And the English language is constantly redefined. We don't speak like the people who wrote Beowulf

Or like Shakespeare

Our language rules are not written in stone

@pompompiggy Sure he may've created the English word for the concept, but like I said a differentiation between gender identity and expression, and biological sex has been around since ancient times

To declare that the concept itself is fabricated is outright false

Are you saying you've never met a masculine woman or an effeminate man? @Pelth

@pompompiggy So have genders other than cisgender

@Pelth My first boyfriend was a twink who liked to wear dresses and skip, and he had an overproduction of testosterone

That's such a meme concept

@quinnn He was a POWERFUL gay man

How do you explain trans people who have no hormonal deficiencies? @Pelth

@pompompiggy No I'm a guy

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/180524112351.htm

There might be a genetic component we don't understand yet, and it might be influenced by environment

but why do either of those things make it illegitimate?

No they're the new breed of 14 year olds who watch Sargon videos and try to repress their homosexuality

@Pelth Okay, if this were true, what about it discredits their experienced gender?

@3v6en8 yeah like I told you we're post-scarcity in terms of food and housing

Inshallah we will destroy all porn companies

Unity on the anti-sex feminist line

@+｡.｡デーモンボーイ｡.｡+ It's an entire school of thought within feminism right now to oppose many forms of supposed sexual liberation as they're patriarchal reformations

It's not liberating to sell pictures of your feet to men online

or to dress in skimpy outfits to impress men

Or to do doggy.

https://belledelphine.club/product/gamergirl-bath-water/ **Capitalism rewards innovation Capitalism rewards innovation Capitalism rewards innovation **

alhamdulillah

@Pelth You're using it wrong.

Bismillah I will hit you with my shoe

Yes.

There is absolutely evidence of how space-time bends and that affects our experiencing of time.

Read an astronomy book

https://youtu.be/AwhKZ3fd9JA
@Pelth nigga learn relativity lmao

Not his general theory of relativity or his writings about the relationship between space and time

These have been substantiated by testing

We’ve observed relativity before and how it affects the experience of time

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/12/after-botched-launch-orbiting-atomic-clocks-confirm-einsteins-theory-relativity
@Pelth

Like relativity have been confirmed by numerous test

We’ve tested it and confirmed it since like the late 1950s

Einstein has been incorrect before, but he is not incorrect in regards to relativity, gravity bending space time, and black holes affecting space time

>Atheist
>Fascist
TFW you’re a staunch materialist empiricist so you reject god, but you also adhere to an idealist ideology which relies on metaphysics and a conception of absolute truth for validity.
🤡

Then why do you reject the idea of a God and claim knowledge of his lack of existence?

Which philosophical argument?

@Pelth Solipsistic/skeptic rejection of knowledge of *any* things is for smooth brains.

God creates the moral and the immoral in a theistic interpretation though. He is inseparable from the concept of what is moral

God definitionally can’t take an immoral action

This argument rest on the idea that God’s morality is understandable to human beings.

How do you know this world is not moral in accordance with the supreme moral code of Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala?

^

I think it’s a redundancy if God is a supreme being, he creates what constitutes moral and determines what constitutes immoral. It’s like saying RoboCop can break the law. He is the law.

God is morality, and the place from which all morals flow, any action he takes would be definitionally moral

@Otto I’m a Muslim and used to be a reactionary theist

I have never prayed to the Father (Marx)

You do not need to trust the agent for the agent to be existent. @Deleted User

Who cares

God deceives in Abrahamic mythology though

He betrays the trust of the pious on numerous occasions to test them, why could God not lie to me?