Message from @Potato
Discord ID: 558831243656036376
space
not as NASA has attempted to portray it
So how do you exactly portray it?
I do not.
?
It is.
its what
and the way it is I am not 100% sure of
giants causeway isn't trees it's volcanic rocks
Ok
the mainstream lie
And i have one last question
they don't even look like tree stubs
compare the structure of trees
look inward
How would you explain relative density without an scientific explanation of what is down and what is up if you get what im saying
Like why doesnt the density allow the object to go upwards
sorry but they look nothing like trees and they're far too close to each other as well
gravity
instead of towards the ground
gravity isn't real in the globe model either
XD
well it does, but it doesn't actually exists
How so?
i'm saying in the model theres gravity
it still looks beautiful and worth visiting though lol
Actually lets just stick to the density topic
For now
just like how in the flat earth model theres none
then move on to that
gravity was just an idea, a label
there was no proper experiment
it cannot be proven as the cause of things falling down to the ground
Yes ik that
prove r
it is just a theory
Can you prove any of your theories
I am asking about the flat earth model
What decides what direction an object goes according to its density
Gravity, although a theory, is one of the most probably theories
the way i found out the earth was flat is that I poured water on a ball and it rolled off, if the earth had "gravity" it would've just stayed on obviously.
I imagine if there was another place, another side, perhaps things might fall upwards
but we are not there - we are here