mixmasterJ
Discord ID: 486207611658829845
99 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1
It's interesting how they've whitewashed the genocide through the scapegoat of infectious disease.
Just testing out discords chat rooms. You mentioned genocide thought I'd throw out my two cents. I'm assuming this is just typical chatbots or?
You're a historian eh
Yea the Americans systematically annihilated the natives, in my mind through superior knowledge of chemistry... which they used to poison the natives to death on a massive scale.
One of my studies is the history of poison so I've formulated more than a few crazy theories
But I basically believe that diseases and epidemics can be traced to natural "chemical" causes within the environment. In all cases. Basically the viewpoint of hippocrates and the like.
I believe that civilization turns disease into a mythological construct, for purposes of depopulation.. mostly.
I mean to say that the "common understanding" of disease is made to be false in many ways... most notably as i said in its origin..
In many cases yes.
There are of course natural poisonings as well.
like springs high in arsenic etc
In the first place they served as a mechanism for the ruling class to regulate population levels. Any symptom generated within the population can be medicalized to become lethal..
The diseases are often generated passively... through pollution of one sort or another.
oopsy
i believe in basic medicine such as fixing broken bones and such
but the majority of pharmacy historically and to the present day is designed in such a way that it will amplify the problems of "disease"...
Couldn't tell ya. And I don't mean to say pharmacy has no practical purpose.
My focus is epidemical diseases.... ie smallpox the plague etc etc.
ah sorry
but they certainly would...
Think about this.. medicine up until 100 years ago was dangerous and increased disease injury and mortality.
Bloodletting and insane dosages of various poisons
For thousands of years, it FUNCTIONED as a tool of depopulation
in the common viewpoint this is... accidental
I don't believe it was accidental but rather by design
My viewpoint is... if medicine HADN'T been lethal I honestly believe civilization wouldn't have surivived. In england for example circa 1800s.... women were popping kids out at 12 and didn't really stop....
if it wasn't for their "stupidly conceived medicine" i believe there's no way society could have continued without disastrous logistical failure...
Medicine in fact greatly increased the odds that those children would die.
Between venesection and... in the case of the 1800s.... mercury arsenic and antimony were given in doses that border on lethal today.
bloodletting was a primary form of medicine.... and they would bleed the sick or injured until they fainted
ah
because... our species is incredibly resilient
seriously, it is a fact that their systems of medicine killed and maimed and accomplished no good outside of placebo
the population explosion is a result of enormous changes that occured in the last 200 years.
Medicine was a major factor... but the biggest change was getting rid of bloodletting and dramatically lowering the dosages of some of the poisons they prescribed.
Ie... medicine became significantly less lethal in the last 100 years
generally speaking
Medicine phased out bloodletting. It fell out of fashion. I believe bloodletting was probably the CORE of regulating population levels from time immemorial.
however they've developed a more sophisticated system
Depends on the tribe but yea
I'm talking about the civilizations that conquered and such
took over the world etc
I mean medicine has always existed
you're talking about vaccines and antibiotics etc
aye...
basically the population will always grow pretty much uncontrollably.
unless there is a system that regulates it
and so for thousands of years ... out of necessity... systems of population regulation have existed
one of the primary forms of this is medicine
historically
I disagree with you there...
Well
Like i said
lets not say depopulate... regulate...
ie increase death levels.... i
decrease birth rates
etc etc
large scale thinking
Sure but there still has to be some form of putting the brakes on
I haven't studied its progress through the east much
but in Europe I know there were real conspiracies to spread it, and the recommended treatments were harmful/lethal
the pope issued proclamations telling people to inhale sewer gas to cure it
well going back to my original theory...
Not necessarily
sometimes they want more, sometimes less..
I believe they were thinking fairly long term...
yes
it was a major transition and i believe it was designed
the reformation introduced iatrochemistry on a large scale... the foundations of modern medicine
suddenly everything that came out of a mine could be sold as medicine, because the "tag along" of the reformation was empirical medicine vs worshipping Galen and etc
which practically speaking meant that they introduced mercury, arsenic, etc etc as primary treatments alongside venesection
Well the black death was just a more extreme form "population regulation"
sure thang
lol right
Well thats how we got the rat theory eh
the rats would flee their subterranean dens.... the black death effected animals as well. rats and small mammals were the first to go
there were actually orchestrated groups who set out to spread plague
google the book " plague spreading conspiracies in the alps"... its court records
about a plague by a ranking medical officer to spread plague in order to keep his "plague hospital contract" going
and etc etc
Hamburger I'll chat wif you in a minute
gonna munch back in 20
yo yo
probably because its a sweet book
i got another one they charge an obcene amount for now
a history of human responses to death
huh its not on there anymore
are u talkin
kinda new to discord
Hey sheeple where are you from? America here.
Prussic acid was used in delousing and inhalatoriums were a thing at the time.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.g``ov/pmc/articles/PMC3170075/
n its periodic safety update reports, GSK, the company manufacturing Infanrix hexa, evaluates whether the number of sudden deaths reported after vaccination with their product exceeded the number that could be expected by chance. The clustering of deaths soon after immunisation suggests that the deaths could have been caused by the vaccine.
Furthermore, our analysis shows that the deaths acknowledged in the PSUR 16 have been deleted from the PSUR 19. The observed deaths are spontaneously reported to GSK and are likely to be underestimated. Adding in the deaths deleted from the PSUR 16, there is a statistically significant increased risk of death in the first four days after vaccination, compared to the expected deaths. The manufacturers will need to explain why these deaths were not included in the PSUR 19. The increased risk of death was not communicated to the regulatory authorities or to the health personnel administering this vaccine.
Given the above, it is difficult to understand how the EMA accepted the PSUR 19 at face value. It may be argued that due diligence was not exercised, as a result of which numerous children were unnecessarily exposed to the risk of death.
Anti-vax is not dumb you meany
99 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/1