Liberty or Death
Discord ID: 781321374316494888
191 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2
No worries, I will not ask you anymore "tough questions."
Then stop labeling.
there you are with your retort calling me names again while at the same time chastising me for not offering solutions to your problem.
That is nice.
I did not set any limitations for you. You set them yourself.
Is this how you teach your students to debate? Just get upset at people that ask you a question about your statements of support of groups and your principles?
There are a lot of people in martial arts that like to tell you who their masters are, and who they have worked out with as a way to prop themselves up. They like to come to our schools and tell us how bad their instructor is and we tell them, "So what. What can your hands do?"
point being, pointing out that your father and brother are attorneys doesn't give you any standing in the law. That is cool and all, and teaching is a noble profession.
You made a statement. I asked you a question. You got pissy and began slinging insults. I tried to engage you in a conversation based on your statement. Obviously, by my question, you can infer that I disagree with you, yet I am open minded to hear your point of view.
oh nay nay sir. I did not make "moronic assumptions." I asked you if you supported their ideology, and you got upset.
You are right. Hardly a debate because you cannot speak to the principles you state you hold, that you "absolutely support" BLM. You absolutely support BLM, yet you claim to be a capatalist..seems rather contradictory.
Well, that is not true. the BLM organization is 100% about skin color, even though the BLM org. has nothing to do with black lives mattering. So, if you 100% support it, then skin color seems important to you.
Well, Happy New Year. I hope you do not teach civics or history or something important.
yes
I never asked if you were ashamed of being white.
I am . Just asking a question. Don't see why insults need to be slung.
Do you know what you call a lawyer with an IQ of 70? Your honor.
that wasn't an attack on your IQ. There are many in our profession that cant take exams but were absent the day they taught law in law school.
No, that was not my position. I asked if you supported their ideology. You responded by getting mad.
have a good day.
No I did not ask that question.
Yes, that was my question. But as you can see I did not ask if you were ashamed of being white. Reread
No, the communist manifesto is very easy to read
So, the communist manifesto, written by Marx, is not really Marxism?
no, I am speaking directly to Marxism. Lenin and Stalin instituted it, Mao perfected it.
No, I did not assert black people are always late. That is one of the tenants taught in African American studies and CRT courses, and the founder of BLM said it.
Personally, I think any assertion of one life mattering over another based on rasceis in itself racist
not really
Indeed it is, stated by their leaders many times.
Lives Matter. Putting a color of skin in front of that statement is racist
um...yes Maw
out of their own mouths.
Well, have a good day. Keep up the good work
I think it is a good point. Count the number of ballots. Here in GA, ballots are supposed to be lept for 22 months. Count the ballots. Without counting the ballots you can't see if there are the same number kept, but without counting you can't see if they were shredded.
I don't see the issue with being transparent, regardless of who wins.
I am watching the hearing now. It is interesting that either 22 month old ballots were stored in a non-goverment facility and just happened to be shredded on the day of certification, or the 22 month old ballots were transported from a government facility to this non-government facility to be shredded.
I liked it earlier when the electrical engineer tried to outsmart the data analyst and got dunked on.
People need to be open minded to a civil discussion.
it was about 2 hours ago.
I am watching it on NTD, the analyst is talking about 1:57;00-ish
Not what I was talking about. But, welcome to the conversation
I wrote it in plain english. Was speaking directly to the shredding of the ballots. Some of us are watching the GA senate hearing in live time.
Yes, ballots in trash cans. Amazing how a park has so many trash cans with paper documents to be shredded
I'm only putting the dots there. I cannot connect them for you.
No, I am nt making up a story. Cute accusation though
That is a funny show.
He specializes in Bird law
No I am not. I am just commenting on what is there. I didn't say one way or the other on the shredding.
You have no idea who I am, what I believe, or what I look like. Notice how I am not sitting here throwing accusations at you?
Y'all have fun. Not interested in dealing with trolls. Here I am on this server just trying to have a conversation and all you want to do is throw accusations and draw bout people you have no idea about. a
yes, those are my words. I stand by them.
Not gossiping. Just mentioning what is on the video of the shredder the day the election was being certified.
Enjoy your day.
Go with Christ.
Because of revisionist history that the Confederate flag stood for racism, when it didn't
NO, not at all. It was the flag for the Confederate States of America. And, sorry to point out history, but though slavery was a major contention and thankfully we were able to end it, it was not the main point for succession.
Well, we can go with emotion, or we can go with factual history. either way
It is not a matter of thinking. I am glad it was abolished, but it wasn't the main reason. Certainly the catlyst
There were also issues with currency and states making treaties with foreign nations
there was a lot that went into it.
It is a shame we needed to go through it to finally abolish slavery.
FYI- revisionist history is not history
I can't teach you to read too.
I just put numerous reasons why
I agree.
I am only stating that we need to put forth all of the reasons for the Civil War, and not just one.
No, that was not the only thing. Like I typed earlier, there were several factors. But slavery was a big one.
which is why even the black slave owners sesnt their black slaves to fight in the civil war
One could say that, but one would be inaccurate.
It served as a rallying cry
and it worked
and it is a good thing.
very funny
I don't think any of it should be banned, or else you lose the facts of history and people make it up along the way.
still not the only reason. There were many reasons, and slavery was a major rallying cry. The call for succession began long before, but the election of Abraham Lincoln was the catalyst.
No I am not, and supposed to be a teacher.
I never said that salvery wasn't a reason, I said it wasn't the only one
It was a reason, a major reason, and was the final rallying cry. but the push for succession had been happening for some time
and slavery was one of many reasons
you are using that word incorrectly. But no, it was not the only reason. That is all I am saying.
No JD, I am not back peddling. I am reiterating the same thing I said since the start.
It is actually not a thing Talon, but cool story though
that is feeding into the myth that the parties flipped when that simply isn't the case
Show is about to start. Have fun.
Nothing to see here
Nothing to see here either. The lady on the left in the purple shirt and blonde fro lawyered up, then was arrested and charged, then nothing. https://youtu.be/CUDHfTO87tM
191 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/2