Wow, you really are a mature individual aren't you?

It is obvious the "JD" in front of your handle does not stand for Juris Doctorate. Here I am thinking you may have the ability to speak rationally and civilly based on what appears to be a signal to your academic acumine.

No worries, I will not ask you anymore "tough questions."

I am. Just over this moronic little labeling of people. Its silly, childish and offers no solution to our problems.

Then stop labeling.

there you are with your retort calling me names again while at the same time chastising me for not offering solutions to your problem.

Well... no. I did not go to law school. My father and brother are lawyers. I wanted to teach. I am 25 and I only have a Masters. So my apologies for not living up to your expectations.

That is nice.

I did not set any limitations for you. You set them yourself.

Is this how you teach your students to debate? Just get upset at people that ask you a question about your statements of support of groups and your principles?

There are a lot of people in martial arts that like to tell you who their masters are, and who they have worked out with as a way to prop themselves up. They like to come to our schools and tell us how bad their instructor is and we tell them, "So what. What can your hands do?"

point being, pointing out that your father and brother are attorneys doesn't give you any standing in the law. That is cool and all, and teaching is a noble profession.

What makes you think I am debating you?

I simply pointed out that you were making moronic little assumptions about me and others. While spouting complete and utter horseshit in the process.

hardly a debate

You made a statement. I asked you a question. You got pissy and began slinging insults. I tried to engage you in a conversation based on your statement. Obviously, by my question, you can infer that I disagree with you, yet I am open minded to hear your point of view.

oh nay nay sir. I did not make "moronic assumptions." I asked you if you supported their ideology, and you got upset.

You asked a fucking stupid question.... am I "ashamed to be white?"

So let me answer it for you..... I am neither ashamed nor proud of the pigment of my skin. I had absolution zero input on the matter.

Anyone that is so stupid to be proud of such things does not garner my respect and will soon lose my attention.

Anything else?

You are right. Hardly a debate because you cannot speak to the principles you state you hold, that you "absolutely support" BLM. You absolutely support BLM, yet you claim to be a capatalist..seems rather contradictory.

Well, that is not true. the BLM organization is 100% about skin color, even though the BLM org. has nothing to do with black lives mattering. So, if you 100% support it, then skin color seems important to you.

Well, Happy New Year. I hope you do not teach civics or history or something important.

read in moment... market issues

SBE taking a dive in price if anyone wants to grab some here

wrong schat

I never asked if you were ashamed of being white.

Wow. You are really not a very logical person, are you?

I do not take pride in skin color, nor am I ashamed by it. Is not at odds with suggesting that people should not be treated different because of skin color, you dolt.

So yes. I absolutely support the BLM Movement (even if I do not know or support each of its members) - Much, like you and the police I would think. I am guessing you support the police as a whole - but you also recognize, as you stated, cops should be prosecuted when they do bad things.

There is no doubt in my mind that some individuals who claimed to be part of the BLM protests became violent. I absolutely do not support that violence. But I do not attribute it to the whole of the movement - much like you do not attribute the murder of a citizen by a single cop to the entire police force.

Why is it that I must support BLM 100% or nothing... but you can pick and choose the level of support for the police?

Sounds a bit like a bullshit double standard to me.... particularly given the fact that the police are supposedly highly trained and regimented group that is paid by Tax Payers to serve and protect. While BLM is a loose group of people with no real structure who happen to believe that cops need to stop killing black men and women at 7 times the rate of whites.

Calm down and be civil folks.

I am . Just asking a question. Don't see why insults need to be slung.

I have no problem with BLM personally, I understand their message and all, but a lot of people use BLM and bloc tactics to engage in their revolutionary fantasies without getting caught.

These are not usually members of BLM.

This is your moronic questions posed.... I responded

No ad hom attacks.

Wow really? Me.... not biased at all

lol

?

Nothing.... because I was the only one making personal attacks there, right?

"JD must not stand for Juris Doctorate"

classy

The question was moronic

I didnt shay he or she was