Nothing.... because I was the only one making personal attacks there, right?

"JD must not stand for Juris Doctorate"

classy

The question was moronic

I didnt shay he or she was

Don't care. Don't engage in personal insults. Don't care if you think it's true or not, don't care if I think it's true or not. Don't do it, simple.

My point her is you are more aligned with his/her views soooo.... we get this nonsense

Probably not.

again... not a personal insult, by definition

a statement or question can be moronic without the speaker being moronic

my IQ was directly attacked by the "Juris Doctorate" jab... but that clearly doesnt matter here

I told both you to be civil and calm down, then you continued. I'm not sure why you think this is biased. I'm probably closer to your viewpoint than his. Perhaps you may want to sit back and take a look at the bigger picture here rather than arguing technicalities with me.

Do you know what you call a lawyer with an IQ of 70? Your honor.

that wasn't an attack on your IQ. There are many in our profession that cant take exams but were absent the day they taught law in law school.

Oh please.... it was clearly a personal attack

I don't see how this is relevant, I already told both of you to stop flinging insults at each other, but you're the one that continued after I said such, hence why I told you SPECIFICALLY to stop.

I stand by your position being complete ridiculous. That I must be a Marxist to be a BLM Supporter. That I must support it 100% along with each and every person "in" that group while you can qualify your support of the police. Its a double standaard.

?

sorry, didn't mean to hit reply

No, that was not my position. I asked if you supported their ideology. You responded by getting mad.

have a good day.

And yes you did ask a question about being ashamed about being white. I think its stupid to be ashamed or take pride in skin pigment (regardless of the hue of that pigment).

I also can hold that position while saying that people should not be treated differently because of that pigment. Those two positions are not contrary in any way.

Agreed 100%.

No I did not ask that question.

@Liberty or Death your statement:
"...so, you are absolutely for Marxism and the destruction of the nuclear family, believe that being on time is a form of white supremecy,and want critical ract theory to be taught in school so students are trained to a) have a victim mentality or b) feel ashamed of being white?
bad police officers need to be prosecuted. But not all police are bad people."

I think people really don't understand marxism.

They don't

Yes, that was my question. But as you can see I did not ask if you were ashamed of being white. Reread

It's become bastardized like most other things in culture.

But that is beside the point

No, the communist manifesto is very easy to read

That's not really marxism.

Marx was more an ancom than a literal communist. Lenin took it a different way though.

What you're talking about is leninism.

So, the communist manifesto, written by Marx, is not really Marxism?

no, I am speaking directly to Marxism. Lenin and Stalin instituted it, Mao perfected it.

It is silly to assert or even believe that someone who supports the BLM MOVEMENT must then also be a Marxists and long for the "destruction of the nuclear family"
And then toss out some horseshit about "being on time" which I can only assume is you trying to assert that black people are always late? Is that what you are saying @Liberty or Death ?

Not the leninism version that the USSR adopted.

No, I did not assert black people are always late. That is one of the tenants taught in African American studies and CRT courses, and the founder of BLM said it.

People conflate marxism with leninism and stalinism/maoism which are very different.