zola
Discord ID: 562719968601309195
460 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/5
| Next
I don't like the idea of regulating curriculum
Less regulations. More freedoms
That's some weird ish
Andy NGO is a legend
Andy tifa wants to take him out bc they claim he doxxes their ppl
But he just takes info from public website and tweets it
And writes articles about how their stupid scumbags
Antifa imo is a domestic terrorist group
Antifa really just a bunch of clowns
Cool can't wait to see vids of police beating them
They're anarchists
Don't be ahy
Monark are u antifa
Are you an antifa sympathizer
I'm curious of your stance re antifa
I don't like them either tbh
Lol
They're basically the same I agree
One just masquerading as good
All the BLM riots were unjustifiable
Lol
I think it's Trump v the establishment
Floyd, Blake, Wendy's, Taylor I believe was the order
You think trump@os part of the est
It's msm + DNC+ China vs America
The problem w BLM is they're racist and bat shit crazy. Floyd died of an OD. Riot. Blake rapes someone fights off tazer and goes for a knife. Riot. And so on
Pass
It's the big one
So for SCOTUS to legit hear a case. With original jurisdiction vs appellate jurisdiction
S a dispute btw states
You need states v States
Now they won't treat it as an appeal
Only for appeals
Now they will have "original" jurisdiction
Vs appellate jurisdiction
Now scotus can rule over everything
Scotus already has this case docketede btw so it's in
I believe there is precedent
But idk what it is
And because they'll have original jurisdiction they can introduce new evidence
Scotus almost always works in an appellate jurisdiction
This is@not an appellate situation
Again, it's an original jurisdiction
And state vs Tate in a federal election manner changes the state relationship bit
The jurisdiction part should clear it up
I'm not arguing either
Most aren't state v state
This is the rate instance
Rare
The second link is super in depth
The exception to that is sTate v tate
That's company v state
Yes why would you assume I didnt
State v state is always original jurisdiction
That was regarding the chemical company vs the states
Not states vs states
The irony
The last imagoi sent uses the article you cited as an example
I encourage you to read it
It does matter if it is a company vs multiple states or a state vs a state
Reading comp clearly isn't your strong suit
Are you? Read it
Sheesh
Touche
Ok u realize that article is irrelevant right
This is where I'm losing u
This statute provides that lower federal courts may also hear cases where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction,[2]:19โ20 with the exception of disputes between two or more states. When a case is between two or more states, the Supreme Court holds both original and exclusive jurisdiction, and no lower court may hear such cases.
Who do they push it down to is the have exclusive
Q is essentially a Bunch of nerds in a basement tricking idiots into believing vague nonsense
I liken it to astrology
Tolerant left
Keep that same energy when the war starts
China def running a psyop has been engaged in a color revolution against USA
Chinas playing chess
They've called in every asset. Every favor
To get Trump out
That's the goal
Politicians generally are bums
All bark no bite
Enter DJT
The Texas suit is the big one
This is the only one that will matter
So when it's a state v another state the SCOTUS has original juris vs appellate jurisdiction
So they can rule and cover every one of the states in question with their ruling
There are a lot of ways this can play out
But I'd bet on them upholding the Constitution
This is part of the plan
To cause the revolt
That is an interesting thread
Speaking of what if
What if everything Trump has been saying is true
What if
If Biden really is a Chinese puppet
I believe it to be so but I'm playing off monarchs comment
460 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/5
| Next