its up to SCOTUS to decide if they want to take it or not, "appropriateness doctrine"

"decline to hear some cases between two states, even where the Court's jurisdiction was exclusive"

State v state is always original jurisdiction

..

That was regarding the chemical company vs the states

Not states vs states

bro

youre not understanding at all

The irony

I knew you weren’t conservative

yes it is irony

Bruh wtf

it doesnt matter if its 1 state or 2 state, its under SCOTUS jurisdiction, BUT they DONT have to take it

they dont give a shit

LMAO the guy in the back

if thy dont want it, they wont take it

its that simple

i dont understand the confusing here

The last imagoi sent uses the article you cited as an example

I encourage you to read it

Rate my setup guys

???

you cant be forreal lol

do you even understand how the process works

It does matter if it is a company vs multiple states or a state vs a state

okay, im going to say it again

even if it falls under SCOTUS jurisdiction "original"

No way that’s your set up

they... dont.. have to take it.. if they dont want it..

doesnt matter... if its.. original... or.. not.

And then the Yandeer tab

thats called consent

okay youre jiust ignorant at this point

Do you guys think Robin Hood was a communist?

Reading comp clearly isn't your strong suit

idk, Robin Hood was all about wealth redistribution

LOL. are you joking?

Sounds pretty commie to me man