Message from @zola

Discord ID: 786135143932493835


2020-12-09 07:38:03 UTC  

Bruh wtf

2020-12-09 07:38:14 UTC  

it doesnt matter if its 1 state or 2 state, its under SCOTUS jurisdiction, BUT they DONT have to take it

2020-12-09 07:38:16 UTC  

they dont give a shit

2020-12-09 07:38:18 UTC  

LMAO the guy in the back

2020-12-09 07:38:22 UTC  

if thy dont want it, they wont take it

2020-12-09 07:38:23 UTC  

its that simple

2020-12-09 07:38:32 UTC  

i dont understand the confusing here

2020-12-09 07:38:39 UTC  

The last imagoi sent uses the article you cited as an example

2020-12-09 07:38:53 UTC  

I encourage you to read it

2020-12-09 07:39:06 UTC  

Rate my setup guys

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/778884457925967883/786134816461946900/1607401098712.jpg

2020-12-09 07:39:17 UTC  

???

2020-12-09 07:39:25 UTC  

you cant be forreal lol

2020-12-09 07:39:29 UTC  

do you even understand how the process works

2020-12-09 07:39:33 UTC  

It does matter if it is a company vs multiple states or a state vs a state

2020-12-09 07:39:46 UTC  

okay, im going to say it again

2020-12-09 07:40:00 UTC  

even if it falls under SCOTUS jurisdiction "original"

2020-12-09 07:40:03 UTC  

No way that’s your set up

2020-12-09 07:40:11 UTC  

they... dont.. have to take it.. if they dont want it..

2020-12-09 07:40:18 UTC  

doesnt matter... if its.. original... or.. not.

2020-12-09 07:40:23 UTC  

And then the Yandeer tab

2020-12-09 07:40:23 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/778884457925967883/786135140094181376/image0.png

2020-12-09 07:40:25 UTC  

thats called consent

2020-12-09 07:41:02 UTC  

okay youre jiust ignorant at this point

2020-12-09 07:41:08 UTC  

Do you guys think Robin Hood was a communist?

2020-12-09 07:41:28 UTC  

Reading comp clearly isn't your strong suit

2020-12-09 07:41:29 UTC  

idk, Robin Hood was all about wealth redistribution

2020-12-09 07:41:41 UTC  

LOL. are you joking?

2020-12-09 07:41:42 UTC  

Sounds pretty commie to me man

2020-12-09 07:41:54 UTC  

Are you? Read it

2020-12-09 07:42:02 UTC  

Sheesh

2020-12-09 07:42:05 UTC  

You're*

2020-12-09 07:42:08 UTC  

no

2020-12-09 07:42:09 UTC  

<:Cringe:783133198729216013>

2020-12-09 07:42:11 UTC  

ur

2020-12-09 07:42:11 UTC  

gottem

2020-12-09 07:42:19 UTC  

Touche

2020-12-09 07:42:28 UTC  

```In the late twentieth century, the Supreme Court further limited its original docket by declaring that it would exercise discretion over whether to hear cases even if they were legitimately within the Court's jurisdiction. In a series of cases in 1971, including Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp ., the Court declined to hear environmental pollution claims brought by states against corporations that dealt with complex and technical factual questions. The justices ruled that the states had other available forums to bring their claims and that the cases were not "appropriate" for the Court in light of its primary function as the nation's highest appellate tribunal. The Court resolved to examine the "seriousness and dignity" of claims so as to preserve its resources for consideration of appeals involving federal questions. The Supreme Court soon expanded its appropriateness doctrine to decline to hear some cases between two states, even where the Court's jurisdiction was exclusive.```

2020-12-09 07:42:35 UTC  

Dwell on it, until you understand what it meanas

2020-12-09 07:42:39 UTC  

I'm really out here owning kids with fax and logeec

2020-12-09 07:42:56 UTC  

Ok u realize that article is irrelevant right

2020-12-09 07:43:00 UTC  

actually, ill just highlight it for you