thats called consent

okay youre jiust ignorant at this point

Do you guys think Robin Hood was a communist?

Reading comp clearly isn't your strong suit

idk, Robin Hood was all about wealth redistribution

LOL. are you joking?

Sounds pretty commie to me man

Are you? Read it

Sheesh

You're*

no

<:Cringe:783133198729216013>

ur

gottem

Touche

```In the late twentieth century, the Supreme Court further limited its original docket by declaring that it would exercise discretion over whether to hear cases even if they were legitimately within the Court's jurisdiction. In a series of cases in 1971, including Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp ., the Court declined to hear environmental pollution claims brought by states against corporations that dealt with complex and technical factual questions. The justices ruled that the states had other available forums to bring their claims and that the cases were not "appropriate" for the Court in light of its primary function as the nation's highest appellate tribunal. The Court resolved to examine the "seriousness and dignity" of claims so as to preserve its resources for consideration of appeals involving federal questions. The Supreme Court soon expanded its appropriateness doctrine to decline to hear some cases between two states, even where the Court's jurisdiction was exclusive.```

Dwell on it, until you understand what it meanas

I'm really out here owning kids with fax and logeec

Ok u realize that article is irrelevant right

actually, ill just highlight it for you

This is where I'm losing u

gotta do all the work

```The Court resolved to examine the "seriousness and dignity" of claims```

``` The Supreme Court soon expanded its appropriateness doctrine```

``` to decline to hear some cases between two states```

This statute provides that lower federal courts may also hear cases where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction,[2]:19–20 with the exception of disputes between two or more states. When a case is between two or more states, the Supreme Court holds both original and exclusive jurisdiction, and no lower court may hear such cases.

```even where the Court's jurisdiction was exclusive.```

AKA, it means

they can judge and decide between themselves

EVEN IF it falls under original jurisdiction

to accept it or not

AKA, they dont give a shit

if they dont want it, they wont take it, doesnt matter if its between two states

United states vs. state

No comprehendo?

```In the late twentieth century, the Supreme Court further limited its original docket by declaring that it would exercise discretion over whether to hear cases even if they were legitimately within the Court's jurisdiction.```

That first sentence should ring a bell

Who do they push it down to is the have exclusive

@zola https://youtu.be/EBg1ZDjPRww?t=1342

the lawyer in podcast will explain it better

they are talking about the same thing we are